A Study on the Current Profile of Schedule Tribes and Schedule Areas

 

Manisha Tharu*, Ram Ganesh Yadav

Department of Sociology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India

*Corresponding Author Email: manishabsip@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The tribal communities in India are living mostly in remote and rural areas. Also, some of these tribes live in remote villages or hamlets. A minor tribal population has moved from remote areas to villages as well as urban areas. There are substantial reasons for lower pace of tribal development activities than what was expected. There is ignorance in these communities of various programmes of the Central and State Governments which have resulted in marginal participation of these communities in such programmes. This is due to lack of awareness and information of these programmes. Although, the Government of India and State Government want the benefits of this programmes to reach to tribal community which is poor, but the fact is that it is not reaching substantially. There are number of agencies of the State and Central Governments which are carrying out the programmes and it makes confusion in the implementation. Sometimes the programmes fail due to uncoordinated efforts. This paper reviews the current profile of the schedule tribes in India and scheduled areas with the intention that the plan development programmes meant for tribal development reach to tribal communities.

 

KEYWORDS: Schedule Tribes, Schedule Areas, Education, Health, Skill Development.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

The human society plays an important part in the earth we live in, in relation to other parts of the world. The tribe belongs to different cultural groups as well as ethnic population. In most of the cases, it is very difficult to differentiate a tribe from a common villager of India in a particular ecological and economical setting. There is no precise definition applicable to a tribe and even in the Constitution of India, where one would find a host of safeguards protecting the interests of the tribes, the term has not been precisely defined1. However, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru described "Development of the tribals should be according to the "lines of their own thinking"2.

 

 

 

Ever since the independence of India, the Government of India as well as State Governments have been implementing five years plans. The latest five year plan was completed in March 2017 and the Planning Commission has been rechristened as National Institution for Transforming India (Niti Aayog) as announced by the current Central Government of India3.The current profile of schedule tribes in India as well as Scheduled Areas is discussed in details.

 

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:

After independence of India, the Central Government and various State Governments have been launching various programmes for development of its populace. The Governments have been giving special consideration in terms of education, health and other immunities to schedule caste and tribes, other backward classes and north-eastern region of the country4. The main objective of this study is to focus on the current profile of the schedule tribes of the country in terms of population, sex ratio, literacy rate, educational level, youth literacy, health indicators, poverty estimates, source of drinking water, employment, women empowerment, domestic violence against women, crime committed against STs and major ST communities.

 

Another major objective of this study is to define the schedule areas for ST communities as currently enshrined in the Constitution of India.

 

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:

The present paper is based on secondary sources such as Census of India, Constitution of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, World Health Organization, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation and other sources like books, reports, journals, committees, articles, papers and internet. The current profile of schedule tribes has been formulated based upon the sources of secondary data in this statistical research and interpretation thereafter. In terms of schedule areas for schedule tribes, various provisions of Constitution of India as amended time to time have been given in this study.

 

 

 

 

CURRENT PROFILE OF SCHEDULED TRIBES:

The population of Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the country, as per Census 2011 is 10.45 crore. STs constitute 8.6 percent of the country's total population and 11.3 percent of the total rural population5. Population of ST males is 5.25 crore and ST females is 5.20 crore. The growth of ST population in 2011 as compared to 2001 as shown in Figure-1.

 

Figure 1: DECADAL GROWTH OF ST POPULATION: 2001-2011

 

The Figure 1 reveals that ST female population growth rate (25%) is higher than ST male population growth rate (23%). State/UT wise ST population by sex and residence is given in (Table-16).


TABLE-1 STATE/UT WISE POPULATION OF SCHEDULED TRIBES BY SEX AND RESIDENCE: CENSUS 2011

S. No.

India / State / UTs Ter

Total/Rural/Urban

Person

Male

Female

 

India

Total

104545716

52547215

51998501

 

 

Rural

94083844

47263733

46820111

 

 

Urban

10461872

5283482

5178390

1

Jammu&Kashmir

Total

1493299

776257

717042

 

 

Rural

1406833

730075

676758

 

 

Urban

86466

46182

40284

2

HimachalPradesh

Total

392126

196118

196008

 

 

Rural

374392

186896

187496

 

 

Urban

17734

9222

8512

3

Uttarakhand

Total

291903

148669

143234

 

 

Rural

264819

134691

130128

 

 

Urban

27084

13978

13106

4

Rajasthan

Total

9238534

4742943

4495591

 

 

Rural

8693123

4454816

4238307

 

 

Urban

545411

288127

257284

5

UttarPradesh

Total

1134273

581083

553190

 

 

Rural

1031076

526315

504761

 

 

Urban

103197

54768

48429

6

Bihar

Total

1336573

682516

654057

 

 

Rural

1270851

648535

622316

 

 

Urban

65722

33981

31741

7

Sikkim

Total

206360

105261

101099

 

 

Rural

167146

86059

81087

 

 

Urban

39214

19202

20012

8

ArunachalPradesh

Total

951821

468390

483431

 

 

Rural

789846

390625

399221

 

 

Urban

161975

77765

84210

9

Nagaland

Total

1710973

866027

844946

 

 

Rural

1306838

665351

641487

 

 

Urban

404135

200676

203459

10

Manipur

Total

1167422

588279

579143

 

 

Rural

1055808

533856

521952

 

 

Urban

111614

54423

57191

11

Mizoram

Total

1036115

516294

519821

 

 

Rural

507467

257987

249480

 

 

Urban

528648

258307

270341

12

Tripura

Total

1166813

588327

578486

 

 

Rural

1117566

563908

553658

 

 

Urban

49247

24419

24828

13

Meghalaya

Total

2555861

1269728

1286133

 

 

Rural

2136891

1070557

1066334

 

 

Urban

418970

199171

219799

14

Assam

Total

3884371

1957005

1927366

 

 

Rural

3665405

1847326

1818079

 

 

Urban

218966

109679

109287

15

West Bengal

Total

5296953

2649974

2646979

 

 

Rural

4855115

2428057

2427058

 

 

Urban

441838

221917

219921

16

Jharkhand

Total

8645042

4315407

4329635

 

 

Rural

7868150

3928323

3939827

 

 

Urban

776892

387084

389808

17

Odisha

Total

9590756

4727732

4863024

 

 

Rural

8994967

4428522

4566445

 

 

Urban

595789

299210

296579

18

Chhattisgarh

Total

7822902

3873191

3949711

 

 

Rural

7231082

3577134

3653948

 

 

Urban

591820

296057

295763

19

MadhyaPradesh

Total

15316784

7719404

7597380

 

 

Rural

14276874

7187769

7089105

 

 

Urban

1039910

531635

508275

20

Gujarat

Total

8917174

4501389

4415785

 

 

Rural

8021848

4042691

3979157

 

 

Urban

895326

458698

436628

21

Daman&Diu

Total

15363

7771

7592

 

 

Rural

7617

3843

3774

 

 

Urban

7746

3928

3818

22

Dadra&NagarHaveli

Total

178564

88844

89720

 

 

Rural

150944

75049

75895

 

 

Urban

27620

13795

13825

23

Maharashtra

Total

10510213

5315025

5195188

 

 

Rural

9006077

4540456

4465621

 

 

Urban

1504136

774569

729567

24

Telangana

Total

3286928

1659963

1626965

 

 

Rural

2939027

1482516

1456511

 

 

Urban

347901

177447

170454

25

AndhraPradesh

Total

2631145

1309399

1321746

 

 

Rural

2293102

1138376

1154726

 

 

Urban

338043

171023

167020

26

Karnataka

Total

4248987

2134754

2114233

 

 

Rural

3429791

1723762

1706029

 

 

Urban

819196

410992

408204

27

Goa

Total

149275

72948

76327

 

 

Rural

87639

43263

44376

 

 

Urban

61636

29685

31951

28

Lakshadweep

Total

61120

30515

30605

 

 

Rural

13463

6752

6711

 

 

Urban

47657

23763

23894

29

Kerala

Total

484839

238203

246636

 

 

Rural

433092

213208

219884

 

 

Urban

51747

24995

26752

30

TamilNadu

Total

794697

401068

393629

 

 

Rural

660280

333178

327102

 

 

Urban

134417

67890

66527

31

Andman & Nicobar Islands

Total

28530

14731

13799

 

Rural

26715

13837

12878

 

Urban

1815

894

921

Further, the States / UTs ranked by proportion of STs, as per Census 2011 are given in (Table-25).

 


Sex Ratio:

The sex ratio in respect of STs is 990, which is higher than national average of 943. Also, ST sex ratio has improved from 978 females per 1000 males in 2001 to 990 in 2011. Goa, Kerala, Arunachal Pradesh, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, etc., have shown high ST sex ratio while Jammu & Kashmir has shown the lowest ST sex ratio at 924 in 2011. State / UT wise ST sex ratio in 2001 and 2011, by residence, are given in (Table-36). Child sex ratio in respect of STs in 0-6 age group has declined from 972 in 2001 to 957 in 2011. However, ST Child sex ratio is higher as compared to child sex ratio for general population at 914 girls to 1000 boys.

 

 

TABLE-2 STATES/UTS RANKED BY PROPORTION OF STS: CENSUS 2011

Bottom 5 States/UTs

Top 5 States/UTs

Uttar Pradesh

0.6%

Lakshadweep

94.8%

Tamil Nadu

1.1%

Mizoram

94.4%

Bihar

1.3%

Nagaland

86.5%

Kerala

1.5%

Meghalaya

86.1%

Uttarakhand

2.9%

Arunachal Pradesh

68.8%

 


TABLE-3 GENDER COMPOSITION OF SCHEDULED TRIBE POPULATION

State/UT

SEX RATIO 2001

SEX RATIO 2011

Total

Rural

Urban

Total

Rural

Urban

India

978

981

944

990

991

980

Jammu & Kashmir

910

916

799

924

927

872

Himachal Pradesh

996

1002

809

999

1003

923

Uttarakhand

950

956

867

963

966

938

Rajasthan

944

950

851

948

951

893

Uttar Pradesh

934

945

850

952

959

884

Bihar

929

934

839

958

960

934

Sikkim

957

950

1024

960

942

1042

Arunachal Pradesh

1003

1000

1020

1032

1022

1083

Nagaland

943

942

946

976

964

1014

Manipur

980

977

1040

984

978

1051

Mizoram

984

959

1012

1007

967

1047

Tripura

970

971

921

983

982

1017

Meghalaya

1000

987

1072

1013

996

1104

Assam

972

974

929

985

984

996

West Bengal

982

984

950

999

1000

991

Jharkhand

987

989

965

1003

1003

1007

Odisha

1003

1006

948

1029

1031

991

Chhattisgarh

1013

1017

941

1020

1021

999

Madhya Pradesh

975

979

912

984

986

956

Gujarat

974

978

926

981

984

952

Daman & Diu

947

952

928

977

982

972

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

1028

1032

973

1010

1011

1002

Maharashtra

973

979

931

977

984

942

Telangana

962

965

922

980

982

961

Andhra Pradesh

983

986

957

1009

1014

977

Karnataka

972

975

960

990

990

993

Goa

893

827

928

1046

1026

1076

Lakshadweep

1003

1001

1006

1003

994

1006

Kerala

1021

1020

1053

1035

1031

1070

Tamil Nadu

980

977

997

981

982

980

A & N Islands

948

954

796

937

931

1030


 


Literacy Rate:

As per Census figures, literacy rate for STs in India improved from 47.1% in 2001 to 59% in 2011.

 

 

Figure 2 GAPS IN LITERACY RATES CENSUS 1991, 2001 AND 2011

 


Among ST males, literacy rate increased from 59.2% to 68.5% and among ST females, literacy rate increased from 34.8% to 49.4% during the same period. Literacy rate for the total population has increased from 64.8% in 2001 to 73% in 2011. There is a gap of about 14 percentage points in literacy rate of STs as compared to the all India literacy rate. The gaps in literacy rates in respect of persons, males and females for the years 1991, 2001 and 2011, as depicted in Figure-2, show progressive decline. Literacy Rates based on Census 1961 onwards are given below in (Table-4) 6.


 

 

 

TABLE-4 LITERACY RATES AMONG STS AND ALL

Year

All

Scheduled Tribes

Persons

Males

Females

Persons

Males

Females

1961

28.30

40.40

15.35

8.35

13.83

3.16

1971

34.45

45.96

21.97

11.30

17.63

4.85

1981

43.57

56.38

29.76

16.35

24.52

8.04

1991

52.21

64.13

39.29

29.60

40.65

18.19

2001

64.84

75.26

53.67

47.10

59.17

34.76

2011

73.00

80.90

64.60

59.00

68.50

49.40

The details of State / UT wise literacy rates of all population, ST population and gaps are given in (Table-5) 6.

 

 

 

TABLE-5 LITERACY RATES OFALL POPULATION, ST POPULATION AND GAPS CENSUS 2011

Sl. No

State /UT

Persons

Male

Female

All

ST

Gap

All

ST

Gap

All

ST

Gap

 

INDIA

73

59

14.0

80.9

68.5

12.4

64.6

49.4

15.2

1

Jammu & Kashmir

67.2

50.6

16.6

76.8

60.6

16.2

56.4

39.7

16.7

2

Himachal Pradesh

82.8

73.6

9.2

89.5

83.2

6.3

75.9

64.2

11.7

3

Uttarakhand

78.8

73.9

4.9

87.4

83.6

3.8

70

63.9

6.1

4

Rajasthan

66.1

52.8

13.3

79.2

67.6

11.6

52.1

37.3

14.8

5

Uttar Pradesh

67.7

55.7

12.0

77.3

67.1

10.2

57.2

43.7

13.5

6

Bihar

61.8

51.1

10.7

71.2

61.3

9.9

51.5

40.4

11.1

7

Sikkim

81.4

79.7

1.7

86.6

85

1.6

75.6

74.3

1.3

8

Arunachal Pradesh

65.4

64.6

0.8

72.6

71.5

1.1

57.7

58

-0.3

9

Nagaland

79.6

80

-0.4

82.8

83.1

-0.3

76.1

76.9

-0.8

10

Manipur

76.9

72.6

4.3

83.6

77.3

6.3

70.3

67.8

2.5

11

Mizoram

91.3

91.5

-0.2

93.3

93.6

-0.3

89.3

89.5

-0.2

12

Tripura

87.2

79.1

8.1

91.5

86.4

5.1

82.7

71.6

11.1

13

Meghalaya

74.4

74.5

-0.1

76

75.5

0.5

72.9

73.5

-0.6

14

Assam

72.2

72.1

0.1

77.8

79

-1.2

66.3

65.1

1.2

15

West Bengal

76.3

57.9

18.4

81.7

68.2

13.5

70.5

47.7

22.8

16

Jharkhand

66.4

57.1

9.3

76.8

68.2

8.6

55.4

46.2

9.2

17

Odisha

72.9

52.2

20.7

81.6

63.7

17.9

64

41.2

22.8

18

Chhattisgarh

70.3

59.1

11.2

80.3

69.7

10.6

60.2

48.8

11.4

19

Madhya Pradesh

69.3

50.6

18.7

78.7

59.6

19.1

59.2

41.5

17.7

20

Gujarat

78

62.5

15.5

85.8

71.7

14.1

69.7

53.2

16.5

21

Daman & Diu

87.1

78.8

8.3

91.5

86.2

5.3

79.5

71.2

8.3

22

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

76.2

61.9

14.3

85.2

73.6

11.6

64.3

50.3

14

23

Maharashtra

82.3

65.7

16.6

88.4

74.3

14.1

75.9

57

18.9

24

Telangana

66.5

49.5

17.0

75

59.5

15.5

57.9

39.4

18.5

25

Andhra Pradesh

67.4

48.8

18.6

74.8

56.9

17.9

60

40.9

19.1

26

Karnataka

75.4

62.1

13.3

82.5

71.1

11.4

68.1

53

15.1

27

Goa

88.7

79.1

9.6

92.6

87.2

5.4

84.7

71.5

13.2

28

Lakshadweep

91.8

91.7

0.1

95.6

95.7

-0.1

87.9

87.8

0.1

29

Kerala

94

75.8

18.2

96.1

80.8

15.3

92.1

71.1

21

30

Tamil Nadu

80.1

54.3

25.8

86.8

61.8

25

73.4

46.8

26.6

31

A & N Islands

86.6

75.6

11.0

90.3

80.9

9.4

82.4

69.9

12.5

All India and State / UT wise details of education level - graduate and above for STs, age 15 years and above as per Census 2011 are given in (Table-65). Literacy rate at all India level for different categories (all ages, age between 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, adolescent (10-19) and youth (15-24) classified for India, gender-wise, for total population and SC / ST in 2011 are given in (Table-7) 6.

 

 

TABLE-6 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL-GRADUATE AND ABOVE FOR SCHEDULED TRIBES AGE 15 AND ABOVE

Sl. No

India / State/UT

 

Percentage of Total Graduate and Above (Col. 3)

Total Graduate and Above

Graduate degree other than technical degree

Post-graduate

other than technical degree

Technical degree or diploma equal to degree or post graduate degree

Engineering and technology

Medicine

Agriculture and dairying

Veterinary

Teaching *

Others

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

 

INDIA

1763879

64.08

18.28

5.92

1.94

0.36

0.11

9.27

0.04

1

Jammu & Kashmir

19320

55.01

22.51

7.16

3.98

0.61

0.45

10.09

0.20

2

Himachal Pradesh

16983

57.57

27.58

4.57

1.74

0.18

0.11

8.20

0.05

3

Uttarakhand

18868

61.74

28.87

4.43

1.35

0.20

0.01

3.40

0.00

4

Rajasthan

199280

52.83

22.17

3.14

1.20

0.11

0.06

20.49

0.01

5

Uttar Pradesh

18275

71.22

19.62

3.64

1.00

0.20

0.01

4.31

0.00

6

Bihar

12772

83.34

9.02

4.60

1.43

0.05

0.10

1.46

0.01

7

Sikkim

9401

71.71

16.93

5.94

2.60

0.55

0.20

2.01

0.06

8

Arunachal Pradesh

33331

70.94

13.40

8.99

3.32

1.03

0.36

1.94

0.02

9

Nagaland

75326

75.44

15.18

4.25

2.22

0.68

0.28

1.92

0.03

10

Manipur

60186

82.04

12.68

2.62

1.61

0.15

0.04

0.85

0.01

11

Mizoram

45681

70.62

16.57

5.51

2.43

0.48

0.38

4.01

0.02

12

Tripura

12074

72.58

15.83

5.47

3.35

0.80

0.15

1.81

0.02

13

Meghalaya

63897

73.85

13.05

5.59

2.47

0.61

0.28

4.13

0.03

14

Assam

74746

83.24

9.80

3.93

1.66

0.19

0.18

0.98

0.02

15

West Bengal

62032

79.85

13.50

3.00

1.03

0.12

0.04

2.44

0.01

16

Jharkhand

144262

79.58

12.76

2.62

0.95

0.13

0.06

3.90

0.01

17

Odisha

64859

71.23

9.64

14.56

1.24

0.14

0.06

3.13

0.00

18

Chhattisgarh

109384

54.98

37.76

4.09

1.39

0.38

0.05

1.35

0.01

19

Madhya Pradesh

121374

59.30

32.64

4.72

1.41

0.37

0.05

1.51

0.00

20

Gujarat

133702

56.13

19.54

5.11

3.11

0.38

0.05

15.55

0.13

21

Daman & Diu

170

63.53

14.71

7.06

3.53

0.00

0.00

11.18

0.00

22

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

2232

38.22

12.90

4.57

4.17

0.00

0.00

40.10

0.04

23

Maharashtra

185590

55.83

15.81

5.78

2.33

0.87

0.09

19.28

0.01

24

Andhra Pradesh

63124

57.36

13.61

10.52

2.75

0.27

0.14

15.11

0.24

25

Telangana

83954

56.08

14.55

13.17

2.89

0.17

0.11

12.88

0.15

26

Karnataka

102014

57.84

12.29

10.82

1.95

0.30

0.09

16.68

0.03

27

Goa

3990

77.57

8.47

6.24

3.48

0.18

0.00

4.06

0.00

28

Lakshadweep

1986

44.66

21.70

8.61

5.09

1.71

0.45

17.12

0.65

29

Kerala

10675

62.49

17.80

8.51

4.14

0.36

0.24

6.41

0.06

30

Tamil Nadu

13970

49.20

20.76

20.08

2.66

0.46

0.19

6.63

0.03

31

A & N Islands

421

46.32

17.10

3.33

5.23

0.00

0.71

27.32

0.00

*Teaching–Junior Basic Training (JBT),B.Ed., M.Ed., etc.

 

TABLE-7 LITERACY RATE

All categories

(age groups)

Total

Scheduled Caste

Scheduled Tribe

Persons

Male

Female

Person

Male

Female

Person

Male

Female

All Ages

73.0

80.9

64.6

66.1

75.2

56.5

59.0

68.5

49.4

10-14

91.1

92.2

90.0

90.3

91.5

89.0

86.4

88.3

84.4

15-19

88.8

91.2

86.2

87.1

89.7

84.1

80.2

85.7

74.6

20-24

83.2

88.8

77.3

79.1

86.2

71.6

69.2

79.6

59.0

Adolescent (10-19)

90.0

91.7

88.2

88.8

90.6

86.8

83.6

87.1

79.9

Youth (15-24)

86.1

90.0

81.8

83.3

88.1

78.0

75.0

82.9

67.1

Gender Parity Index (GPI) for Scheduled Tribe students has shown improvement at Secondary and Senior Secondary levels as well as at Higher Education level. Data are given in (Table-87,8).

 

 


 

TABLE-8 GENDER PARITY INDEX (GPI) FOR SCHEDULED TRIBE STUDENTS

Level /Year

Secondary

(IX-X)

Senior Secondary

(XI-XII)

Higher Education

2013-14

1.00

0.93

0.81

2014-15

1.01

0.95

0.81

2015-16

1.02

0.97

0.83

2016-17

NA

NA

0.85

 

 

Health Indicators:

As per National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4, conducted by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare during 2015-169, status of Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR) and anaemia in women for STs as well as all categories are shown in Figure-3.

 

Figure-3 HEALTH INDICATORS: NFHS-4 (2015-16)

 

Health Infrastructure in Tribal Areas:

As per the figures pertaining to the Rural Health Infrastructure in Tribal Areas, published by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, there are 28200 Sub Centres (SCs), 4024 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 1028 Community Health Centres (CHCs) in position as on 31st March, 2017. The number of existing Sub Centres has increased by 242, PHCs by 67 and CHCs by 30 in 2017 over 2015. At all India level, there is a shortfall of 6503 SCs, 1240 PHCs and 273 CHCs in tribal areas as on 31st March 2017 as compared to requirement. Further, there is a huge shortfall in number of Sub-Centres in Madhya Pradesh (1806), Rajasthan (1239), Maharashtra (945), Karnataka (822) and Odisha (309). There is a shortfall of 381 PHCs in Madhya Pradesh (MP), followed by 228 in Jharkhand and 225 in Rajasthan. In case of CHCs, MP shows maximum shortfall (74), followed by Maharashtra (45) and Rajasthan (43). The requirement is calculated using the prescribed norms for rural health care infrastructure, given in (Table-910).

 

TABLE-9 RURAL HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE

Centre

Population Norms

Plain Area

Hilly/Tribal/Difficult Area

Sub Centre

5000

3000

Primary Health Centre

30,000

20,000

Community Health Centre

1,20,000

80,000

 

Poverty Estimates:

The erstwhile Planning Commission provided estimates based on Tendulkar Methodology for poverty ratios for the years for which large Sample Surveys on Household Consumer Expenditure have been conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation11. As per these estimates, ST people living below the poverty line in 2011-12 were 45.3% in the rural areas and 24.1% in the urban areas as compared to 25.7% persons in rural areas and 13.7% persons in urban areas below poverty line for all population. State-wise details for the years 2009-10 and 2011-12 are given in (Table-10).

 

TABLE-10 PERCENTAGE OF ST POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LINE DURING 2009-10 AND 2011-12 (TENDULKAR METHODOLOGY)

S.No.

State

Rural

Urban

2009-10

2011-12

2009-10

2011-12

1

Andhra Pradesh

40.2

24.1

21.2

12.1

2

Assam

32.0

33.4

29.2

15.6

3

Bihar

64.4

59.3

16.5

10.3

4

Chhattisgarh

66.8

52.6

28.6

35.2

5

Gujarat

48.6

36.5

32.2

30.1

6

Himachal Pradesh

22.0

9.5

19.6

4.0

7

Jammu & Kashmir

3.1

16.3

15.0

3.0

8

Jharkhand

51.5

51.6

49.5

28.7

9

Karnataka

21.3

30.8

35.6

33.7

10

Kerala

24.4

41.0

5.0

13.6

11

Madhya Pradesh

61.9

55.3

41.6

32.3

12

Maharashtra

51.7

61.6

32.4

23.3

13

Odisha

66.0

63.5

34.1

39.7

14

Rajasthan

35.9

41.4

28.9

21.7

15

Tamil Nadu

11.5

36.8

17.6

2.8

16

Uttar Pradesh

49.8

27.0

20.2

16.3

17

Uttarakhand

20.0

11.9

0

25.7

18

West Bengal

32.9

50.1

20.6

44.5

 

AllIndia

47.4

45.3

30.4

24.1

 

Percentage of ST Households and their Source of Lighting–a comparative picture of ST and All categories:

As per Census 20115, the all India picture shows that Electricity is the main source of lighting, for ST households and all households followed by use of Kerosene. In Lakshadweep, 99.7% households have Electricity as the main source of lighting. It is followed by Daman and Diu (96.6%), Himachal Pradesh (94.5%), Andaman and Nicobar Islands (94%) and Goa (93.8%). In North Eastern States, among the ST households, Electricity is the main source of lighting. Sikkim is the highest (91.5%) followed by Mizoram (84.3%) and Nagaland (81.2%). Bihar and Odisha show a grim picture, with only 11.5% ST households (lowest) in Bihar having Electricity as against 16.4% of all households and Odisha with 15.6% ST households as against 43% all households. ST households in Bihar and Odisha are highest users of Kerosene.

 

Percentage of ST Households by the condition of Census houses occupied by them–comparative picture of ST and All categories:

As per Census 20115, 40.6% ST households are seen to be having good houses as against 53% of total households. The highest number of ST households having good houses (87%) is seen in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Among the lowest in this category is Odisha with 19% ST households having good houses followed by West Bengal 28%, Bihar and Rajasthan 31% each and Assam 32%. At the all India level, 53.7% ST households as against61.3% of all households are having separate kitchen inside the houses. The highest number of ST households in this category is seen in Andaman and Nicobar Islands (97.9%) followed by Nagaland(96.8%), Lakshadweep (96.6%) Sikkim (91.7%),Meghalaya (91.2%) and Goa (90.2%).There are 7States falling below the all India percentage, the lowest being Rajasthan (22.1%) followed by Bihar(34.4%), Jharkhand (34.5%), Madhya Pradesh(36.6%), Andhra Pradesh (37.8%), Uttar Pradesh(43.0%) and West Bengal (48.2%) having kitchen inside the houses of the ST households.

 

 

Percentage of ST Households by location of main source of drinking water:

According to Census 20115 data, it is seen that while almost 47 percent of all households in the country have drinking water facilities within their premises, less than 20% of the ST households enjoy this convenience. More than one third of the ST households have to spend time and energy fetching drinking water from far away sources as against only about 18% of all households at all India level. State / UT wise details are given in (Table-11).


 

TABLE-11 HOUSEHOLDS BY LOCATION OF THE MAIN SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER

State/UT

% of Households (all)

(%) ST Households

By Location of the Main Source of Drinking Water

Within the premises

Near the premises

Away

Within the premises

Near the remises

Away

India

46.6

35.8

17.6

19.7

46.7

33.6

A&N Islands

60.6

27.0

12.4

61.0

15.7

23.3

Andhra Pradesh

43.2

37.3

19.5

21.0

45.7

33.4

Arunachal Pradesh

41.1

37.4

21.6

36.5

40.4

23.1

Assam

54.8

26.7

18.5

47.3

28.9

23.8

Bihar

50.1

37.9

12.0

40.9

41.4

17.7

Chandigarh

86.1

11.6

2.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

Chhattisgarh

19.0

54.5

26.5

9.1

57.7

33.2

Dadra & Nagar Haveli

52.6

36.4

10.9

28.7

50.2

21.0

Daman & Diu

76.4

22.1

1.5

57.6

36.9

5.5

Goa

79.7

15.5

4.8

58.7

28.9

12.4

Gujarat

64.0

23.5

12.4

28.8

46.4

24.8

Haryana

66.5

21.4

12.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Himachal Pradesh

55.5

35.0

9.5

48.9

41.2

9.9

Jammu & Kashmir

48.2

28.7

23.1

15.3

39.2

45.5

Jharkhand

23.2

44.9

31.9

8.3

49.4

42.3

Karnataka

44.5

37.3

18.2

27.2

45.6

27.2

Kerala

77.7

14.1

8.2

44.3

30.4

25.4

Lakshadweep

83.7

14.3

2.0

83.9

14.2

1.9

Madhya Pradesh

23.9

45.6

30.5

8.4

50.1

41.5

Maharashtra

59.4

27.5

13.1

33.9

43.3

22.8

Manipur

16.1

46.2

37.8

13.3

52.9

33.8

Meghalaya

24.1

43.2

32.7

18.8

46.2

35.0

Mizoram

31.2

46.7

22.2

30.6

47.0

22.4

Nagaland

29.3

42.4

28.3

26.1

44.1

29.8

NCT of Delhi

78.4

15.4

6.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

Odisha

22.4

42.2

35.4

6.2

49.2

44.6

Puducherry

77.4

21.5

1.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Punjab

85.9

10.0

4.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Rajasthan

35.0

39.0

25.9

11.0

47.5

41.5

Sikkim

52.6

29.7

17.7

48.8

31.7

19.5

Tamil Nadu

34.9

58.1

7.0

21.1

65.9

13.0

Tripura

37.1

30.5

32.4

14.2

32.2

53.6

Uttar Pradesh

51.9

36.0

12.1

43.0

38.8

18.2

Uttarakhand

58.3

26.6

15.2

55.8

31.1

13.1

West Bengal

38.6

34.7

26.6

18.6

44.3

37.1

 


Employment:

Worker Population Ratio (WPR)

As per the fifth Annual Employment-Unemployment Survey 2015-16, conducted by Ministry of Labour and Employment, the Worker Population Ratio (WPR) for different social groups based on Usual Principal Status (UPS) approach and Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (UPSS) approach are given in (Table-1212). At the All India level, WPR was the highest under Scheduled Tribe category with 54.2% followed by 50.6% under the Scheduled Caste category, 47.8% for Other Backward Class category and 44.0% for others category based on Usual Principle Status (UPS) approach.

 

TABLE-12 WORKER POPULATION RATIO

All India (in percent)

Approach

Scheduled Caste

Scheduled Tribe

OBC

Others

UPS

50.6

54.2

47.8

44.0

UPSS

53.7

60.0

50.4

45.5

The unemployment rate signifies the proportion of persons who are available for work, but did not get work during the reference period. Based on the Usual Principal Status (UPS) approach, the unemployment rate at the All India level was 5.2% for Other Backward Class category which was highest among all four social groups. In case of Scheduled Caste and Others category, the unemployment was estimated to be 5.0% each. The lowest unemployment rate was recorded as 4.4 % under Scheduled Tribe category.

 

Women Empowerment:

The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles. The Constitution not only grants equality to women, but also empowers the State to adopt measures of positive discrimination in favour of women. Empowerment is seen as a process by which the ones without power gain greater control over their lives. This means control over material assets, intellectual resources and ideology. It involves power to, power with and power within. Some define empowerment as a process of awareness and conscientization, of capacity building leading to greater participation, effective decision-making power and control leading to transformative action. This involves ability to get what one wants and to influence others on our concerns. With reference to women, the power relation that has to be involved includes their lives at multiple levels - family, community, market and the state. Importantly, it involves at the psychological level - women’s ability to assert them and this is constructed by the ‘gender roles’ assigned to her especially in a cultural setup which resists change like India.

 

Domestic violence against women:

Violence against women is present in every country, cutting across boundaries of culture, class, education, income, ethnicity and age. Specific groups of women are more vulnerable, including minority groups, indigenous and migrant women, refugee women and those in situations of armed conflict, women in institutions and detention, women with disabilities, female children, and elderly women. Domestic violence is the most prevalent yet relatively hidden and ignored form of violence against women and girls. Violence against women has serious consequences for their mental and physical well-being including their reproductive and sexual health9. One of the most common forms of violence against women worldwide is abuse by a husband. Women Empowerment and Domestic Violence Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India 2013 shows that prevalence of violence is much higher among women belonging to STs and SCs than among women who do not belong to these categories. While variation in violence during the 12 months preceding the survey by different social group pattern, the differentials is much smaller as shown in Figure-4.

 

Figure-4 Women who have experienced Domestic Violence14

 

Crimes Committed against ST Population in India:

As per data released by National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)13, Ministry of Home Affairs, Madhya Pradesh (1823 cases) reported the highest number of cases of atrocities against Scheduled Tribes (STs) accounting for 27.8% followed by Rajasthan with 18.2% (1195 cases) and Odisha with 10.4 % (681 cases) during 2016. State /UT wise details are given in (Table-13).

 

TABLE-13 CRIMES/ATROCITIES AGAINST STS

Crime Head

Crime Incidence

Crime Rate

2014

2015

2016

2014

2015

2016

Atrocities Against STs

6827

6276

6568

6.5

6.0

6.3

 

India is committed to the welfare and development of its people in general and of vulnerable sections of society in particular. Equality of status and opportunity to all citizens of the country is guaranteed by the Constitution of India, which also provides that no individual shall be discriminated against on the grounds of religion, caste or sex, etc. Fundamental Rights and other specific provisions, namely, Articles 38, 39 and 46 in the Constitution of India1 stand testimony to the commitment of the State towards its people. The strategy of the State is to secure distributive justice and allocation of resources to support programmes for social, economic and educational advancement of the weaker sections in general and those of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in particular. The Scheduled Tribes in India have not remained untouched from various crimes. They have been victims of countless crimes, both because of their gullibility and lack of hearing of their grievances. Looking at the year wise comparative data on the crimes committed against Scheduled Tribes, from 2006 to 2012, it is seen that: Murders decreased from 2006 to 2010 but increased in the year 2011 and 2012.The increase in murders in 2012 was about 9.09% over the year 2011. Rapes decreased from 2006 to 2009 but increased in 2010 and 2011. However a marginal fall of 5.57% was noticed in 2012 over 2011. Similar trend was seen in case of kidnappings and abductions with a sharp decline of 24.82% in 2012. Dacoity also registered a fall of 28.57% in 2012 over 2011 while robbery rose13.

 

Major ST Communities:

There are over 700 Scheduled Tribe communities spread over different States and Union Territories of the country. Within ST population, some ST communities count each more than 5%population in every State. These have been identified and compiled State/UT wise. In 31 States/UTs, out of more than 700 Scheduled Tribe communities, 111 communities count each 5% (of ST population of concerned State/UT). These 111 communities add up to 803.25 lakhs, i.e., 76.8%of total ST population18,19.


 

TABLE-14 CASES REGISTERED UNDER CRIMES AGAINST STS IN INDIA DURING 2001-2012

S. No.

Crime

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

% variation of 2012 over 2011

1

Murder

195

140

124

122

124

143

156

9.09

2

Rape

699

627

585

589

640

772

729

-5.57

3

Kidnapping and Abduction

88

89

87

66

69

137

103

-24.82

4

Dacoity

12

9

13

3

7

7

5

-28.57

5

Robbery

29

21

17

22

5

9

15

66.67

6

Arson

46

54

46

27

33

24

26

8.33

7

Hurt

838

855

777

715

917

803

816

1.62

8

Other Crimes Against STs

2603

2628

2855

2882

2927

2700

2759

2.19

9

Protection of Civil Rights Act

49

5

6

2

5

7

2

-71.43

10

SC/ST (POA) Act

1232

1104

882

822

1037

1154

1311

13.60

 

Total Crimes against STs

5791

5532

5392

5250

5764

5756

5922

2.88

 


SCHEDULED AREAS:

The Scheduled Tribes mostly live in contiguous areas unlike other communities. It is, therefore, much simpler to have an area approach for development activities as well as regulatory provisions to protect their interests. In order to protect the interests of Scheduled Tribes with regard to land and other social issues various provisions have been enshrined in the Fifth Schedule and the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution11.

 

Criteria for Declaration of Scheduled Areas:

Criteria for declaring any area as a “Scheduled Area” under the Fifth Schedule are:

(i)    Preponderance of tribal population,

(ii)   Compactness and reasonable size of the area,

(iii)  A viable administrative entity such as a district, block or taluk, and

(iv)  Economic backwardness of the area as compared to the neighbouring areas. The above criteria for declaration of Scheduled Areas are as such not spelt out in the Constitution, but have become well established.

 

Fifth Schedule:

The Fifth Schedule under Article 244 (1) of the Constitution contains provisions regarding administration of Scheduled Areas other than in Northeast India. The provisions of Section 6 of Part C of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution are as follows: “Scheduled Areas–(1) In this Constitution, the expression "Scheduled Areas" means such areas as the President may by order declare to be Scheduled Areas.

Sixth Schedule:

The Sixth Schedule under Article 244 (2) and 275 (1) of the Constitution provisions as to the administration of Tribal Areas in the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. It also provisions for autonomous districts and autonomous regions in such areas. The subject matter relating to Sixth Schedule comes under purview of Ministry of Home Affairs.

 

The President may at any time by order- (a) direct that the whole or any specified part of a Scheduled Area shall cease to be a Scheduled Area or a part of such an area; (aa) increase the area of any Scheduled Area in a State after consultation with the Governor of that State; (b) alter, but only by way of rectification of boundaries, any Scheduled Area; (c) on any alteration of the boundaries of a State or on the admission into the Union or the establishment of a new State, declare any territory not previously included in any State to be, or to form part of, a Scheduled Area; (d) rescind, in relation to any State or States, any order or orders made under this paragraph, and in consultation with the Governor of the State concerned, make fresh orders redefining the areas which are to be Scheduled Areas; and any such order may contain such incidental and consequential provisions as appear to the President to be necessary and proper, but save as aforesaid, the order made under sub-paragraph (1) of this paragraph shall not be varied by any subsequent order.

 

Coverage of Scheduled Areas:

At present, Scheduled Areas have been declared in the States of Andhra Pradesh (including Telangana), Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha and Rajasthan.

 

Law Applicable to Scheduled Areas:

Provisions of Para 5 of Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, relating to role of the Governor of a State, which has Scheduled Areas, are given below: “(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the Governor may by public notification direct that any particular Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State shall not apply to a Scheduled Area or any part thereof in the State or shall apply to a Scheduled Area or any part thereof in the State subject to such exceptions and modifications as he may specify in the notification and any direction given under this sub-paragraph may be given so as to have retrospective effect. (2) The Governor may make regulations for the peace and good government of any area in a State which is for the time being a Scheduled Area. In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may - (a) prohibit or restrict the transfer of land by or among members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area; (b) regulate the allotment of land to members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area; (c) regulate the carrying on of business as money-lender by persons who lend money to members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area. (3) In making any such regulation as is referred to in sub-paragraph (2) of this paragraph, the Governor may repeal or amend any Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State or any existing law which is for the time being applicable to the area in question. (4) All regulations made under this paragraph shall be submitted forthwith to the President and, until assented to by him, shall have no effect. (5) No regulation shall be made under this paragraph unless the Governor making the regulation has, in the case where there is a Tribes Advisory Council for the State, consulted such Council.”

 

Reports by the Governor to the President:

In accordance with the provisions of Part A, Para 3 of Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, the Governor of each State having Scheduled Areas therein shall annually, or whenever so required by the President, make a report to the President regarding the administration of the Scheduled Areas in that State and the executive power of the Union shall extend to the giving of directions to the State as to the administration of the said area. As per Constitutional provision, States having Scheduled Areas, viz., Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana are required to submit Governor’s Report annually.

 

CONCLUSION:

Indian Scheduled Tribes are the group of tribal communities and was given the name Scheduled Tribes during the post-Independence period, under the rule of Indian Constitution. The primary criteria adopted for delimiting Indian backward communities as Scheduled Tribes includes, traditional occupation of a definitive geographical area, characteristic culture that includes a whole range of tribal modes of life, i.e., language, customs, traditions, religious beliefs, arts and crafts, etc., archaic traits portraying occupational pattern, economy, etc., and lack of educational and economic development. The profile of schedule tribes since independence has been changing like other communities. The areas of populations, education, medical health, basic amenities like water, electricity, etc and the crimes against ST population have been analyzed over the past decade or so. However, the change observed in schedule tribes has been slower than other communities. Due to lack of awareness among these communities, the slower rate has been observed20,21. The schedule areas spread among the length and breadth of India and the current profile of schedule areas as per the Constitution of India has been presented. The central government and state governments have initiated schemes for betterment of scheduled tribes but still all programs are not reaching effectively to the tribes hence, government should take concert decisions to make them effective and some more programs are to be introduced for betterment of Scheduled Tribes in India22.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      The Constitution of India.

2.      Jayakumar A. and Palaniyammal P. Socio-economic status of scheduled tribes in Kalrayan hills. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, 4 (3); 2016: 22-30.

3.      https://www.niti.gov.in/

4.      Ministry of Socio Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India.

5.      http://censusindia.gov.in

6.      Office of the Registrar General, India

7.      Bhttp://udise.in/contactus.htm

8.      http://aishe.nic.in/aishe/home

9.      http://www.who.int/

10.   http://rchiips.org/nfhs/

11.   http://www.mospi.gov.in/national-sample-survey-office-nsso

12.   http://labourbureaunew.gov.in/UserContent/EUS_5th_1.pdf

13.   http://ncrb.gov.in/

14.   https://www.tribal.nic.in/ST/StatisticalProfileofSTs2013.pdf

15.   Indian Scheduled Tribes

16.   Status of Women in Tribal Society of India – Essay [Online].

17.   Journal of Rural Studies. 16 (1); 2009: 1-11.

18.   Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Development of Tribal Women in Society, International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 6 (8); 2018: 621-626.

19.   Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Effects of Technological Development through Electronic Communication in Women Empowerment, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHSS). 7 (5); 2018: 93-100.

20.   Socio-economic empowerment of women through ‘Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013’ – the missing link?

21.   Ministry of Socio Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India.

22.   Panduranga R and Nayakara Honnurswamy, Status of Scheduled Tribes In India, ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. ISSN 2348-3164 (online) 2 (4)2014: 245-252.

23.   Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Impact of Skill Development Programmes on Tribal Communities: A Case Study of Lakhimpur Kheri District of Uttar Pradesh, International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 6 (9); 2018:237-250.

 

 

 

 

Received on 29.10.2018         Modified on 29.11.2018

Accepted on 28.12.2018      ©AandV Publications All right reserved

Res.  J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(2): 513-523.

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00085.8