A Study on the Current Profile of Schedule Tribes and Schedule Areas
Manisha Tharu*, Ram Ganesh Yadav
Department of Sociology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India
ABSTRACT:
The tribal communities in India are living mostly in remote and rural areas. Also, some of these tribes live in remote villages or hamlets. A minor tribal population has moved from remote areas to villages as well as urban areas. There are substantial reasons for lower pace of tribal development activities than what was expected. There is ignorance in these communities of various programmes of the Central and State Governments which have resulted in marginal participation of these communities in such programmes. This is due to lack of awareness and information of these programmes. Although, the Government of India and State Government want the benefits of this programmes to reach to tribal community which is poor, but the fact is that it is not reaching substantially. There are number of agencies of the State and Central Governments which are carrying out the programmes and it makes confusion in the implementation. Sometimes the programmes fail due to uncoordinated efforts. This paper reviews the current profile of the schedule tribes in India and scheduled areas with the intention that the plan development programmes meant for tribal development reach to tribal communities.
KEYWORDS: Schedule Tribes, Schedule Areas, Education, Health, Skill Development.
INTRODUCTION:
The human society plays an important part in the earth we live in, in relation to other parts of the world. The tribe belongs to different cultural groups as well as ethnic population. In most of the cases, it is very difficult to differentiate a tribe from a common villager of India in a particular ecological and economical setting. There is no precise definition applicable to a tribe and even in the Constitution of India, where one would find a host of safeguards protecting the interests of the tribes, the term has not been precisely defined1. However, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru described "Development of the tribals should be according to the "lines of their own thinking"2.
Ever since the independence of India, the Government of India as well as State Governments have been implementing five years plans. The latest five year plan was completed in March 2017 and the Planning Commission has been rechristened as National Institution for Transforming India (Niti Aayog) as announced by the current Central Government of India3.The current profile of schedule tribes in India as well as Scheduled Areas is discussed in details.
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:
After independence of India, the Central Government and various State Governments have been launching various programmes for development of its populace. The Governments have been giving special consideration in terms of education, health and other immunities to schedule caste and tribes, other backward classes and north-eastern region of the country4. The main objective of this study is to focus on the current profile of the schedule tribes of the country in terms of population, sex ratio, literacy rate, educational level, youth literacy, health indicators, poverty estimates, source of drinking water, employment, women empowerment, domestic violence against women, crime committed against STs and major ST communities.
Another major objective of this study is to define the schedule areas for ST communities as currently enshrined in the Constitution of India.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The present paper is based on secondary sources such as Census of India, Constitution of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs, World Health Organization, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation and other sources like books, reports, journals, committees, articles, papers and internet. The current profile of schedule tribes has been formulated based upon the sources of secondary data in this statistical research and interpretation thereafter. In terms of schedule areas for schedule tribes, various provisions of Constitution of India as amended time to time have been given in this study.
CURRENT PROFILE OF SCHEDULED TRIBES:
The population of Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the country, as per Census 2011 is 10.45 crore. STs constitute 8.6 percent of the country's total population and 11.3 percent of the total rural population5. Population of ST males is 5.25 crore and ST females is 5.20 crore. The growth of ST population in 2011 as compared to 2001 as shown in Figure-1.
Figure 1: DECADAL GROWTH OF ST POPULATION: 2001-2011
The Figure 1 reveals that ST female population growth rate (25%) is higher than ST male population growth rate (23%). State/UT wise ST population by sex and residence is given in (Table-16).
TABLE-1 STATE/UT WISE POPULATION OF SCHEDULED TRIBES BY SEX AND RESIDENCE: CENSUS 2011
S. No. |
India / State / UTs Ter |
Total/Rural/Urban |
Person |
Male |
Female |
|
India |
Total |
104545716 |
52547215 |
51998501 |
|
|
Rural |
94083844 |
47263733 |
46820111 |
|
|
Urban |
10461872 |
5283482 |
5178390 |
1 |
Jammu&Kashmir |
Total |
1493299 |
776257 |
717042 |
|
|
Rural |
1406833 |
730075 |
676758 |
|
|
Urban |
86466 |
46182 |
40284 |
2 |
HimachalPradesh |
Total |
392126 |
196118 |
196008 |
|
|
Rural |
374392 |
186896 |
187496 |
|
|
Urban |
17734 |
9222 |
8512 |
3 |
Uttarakhand |
Total |
291903 |
148669 |
143234 |
|
|
Rural |
264819 |
134691 |
130128 |
|
|
Urban |
27084 |
13978 |
13106 |
4 |
Rajasthan |
Total |
9238534 |
4742943 |
4495591 |
|
|
Rural |
8693123 |
4454816 |
4238307 |
|
|
Urban |
545411 |
288127 |
257284 |
5 |
UttarPradesh |
Total |
1134273 |
581083 |
553190 |
|
|
Rural |
1031076 |
526315 |
504761 |
|
|
Urban |
103197 |
54768 |
48429 |
6 |
Bihar |
Total |
1336573 |
682516 |
654057 |
|
|
Rural |
1270851 |
648535 |
622316 |
|
|
Urban |
65722 |
33981 |
31741 |
7 |
Sikkim |
Total |
206360 |
105261 |
101099 |
|
|
Rural |
167146 |
86059 |
81087 |
|
|
Urban |
39214 |
19202 |
20012 |
8 |
ArunachalPradesh |
Total |
951821 |
468390 |
483431 |
|
|
Rural |
789846 |
390625 |
399221 |
|
|
Urban |
161975 |
77765 |
84210 |
9 |
Nagaland |
Total |
1710973 |
866027 |
844946 |
|
|
Rural |
1306838 |
665351 |
641487 |
|
|
Urban |
404135 |
200676 |
203459 |
10 |
Manipur |
Total |
1167422 |
588279 |
579143 |
|
|
Rural |
1055808 |
533856 |
521952 |
|
|
Urban |
111614 |
54423 |
57191 |
11 |
Mizoram |
Total |
1036115 |
516294 |
519821 |
|
|
Rural |
507467 |
257987 |
249480 |
|
|
Urban |
528648 |
258307 |
270341 |
12 |
Tripura |
Total |
1166813 |
588327 |
578486 |
|
|
Rural |
1117566 |
563908 |
553658 |
|
|
Urban |
49247 |
24419 |
24828 |
13 |
Meghalaya |
Total |
2555861 |
1269728 |
1286133 |
|
|
Rural |
2136891 |
1070557 |
1066334 |
|
|
Urban |
418970 |
199171 |
219799 |
14 |
Assam |
Total |
3884371 |
1957005 |
1927366 |
|
|
Rural |
3665405 |
1847326 |
1818079 |
|
|
Urban |
218966 |
109679 |
109287 |
15 |
West Bengal |
Total |
5296953 |
2649974 |
2646979 |
|
|
Rural |
4855115 |
2428057 |
2427058 |
|
|
Urban |
441838 |
221917 |
219921 |
16 |
Jharkhand |
Total |
8645042 |
4315407 |
4329635 |
|
|
Rural |
7868150 |
3928323 |
3939827 |
|
|
Urban |
776892 |
387084 |
389808 |
17 |
Odisha |
Total |
9590756 |
4727732 |
4863024 |
|
|
Rural |
8994967 |
4428522 |
4566445 |
|
|
Urban |
595789 |
299210 |
296579 |
18 |
Chhattisgarh |
Total |
7822902 |
3873191 |
3949711 |
|
|
Rural |
7231082 |
3577134 |
3653948 |
|
|
Urban |
591820 |
296057 |
295763 |
19 |
MadhyaPradesh |
Total |
15316784 |
7719404 |
7597380 |
|
|
Rural |
14276874 |
7187769 |
7089105 |
|
|
Urban |
1039910 |
531635 |
508275 |
20 |
Gujarat |
Total |
8917174 |
4501389 |
4415785 |
|
|
Rural |
8021848 |
4042691 |
3979157 |
|
|
Urban |
895326 |
458698 |
436628 |
21 |
Daman&Diu |
Total |
15363 |
7771 |
7592 |
|
|
Rural |
7617 |
3843 |
3774 |
|
|
Urban |
7746 |
3928 |
3818 |
22 |
Dadra&NagarHaveli |
Total |
178564 |
88844 |
89720 |
|
|
Rural |
150944 |
75049 |
75895 |
|
|
Urban |
27620 |
13795 |
13825 |
23 |
Maharashtra |
Total |
10510213 |
5315025 |
5195188 |
|
|
Rural |
9006077 |
4540456 |
4465621 |
|
|
Urban |
1504136 |
774569 |
729567 |
24 |
Telangana |
Total |
3286928 |
1659963 |
1626965 |
|
|
Rural |
2939027 |
1482516 |
1456511 |
|
|
Urban |
347901 |
177447 |
170454 |
25 |
AndhraPradesh |
Total |
2631145 |
1309399 |
1321746 |
|
|
Rural |
2293102 |
1138376 |
1154726 |
|
|
Urban |
338043 |
171023 |
167020 |
26 |
Karnataka |
Total |
4248987 |
2134754 |
2114233 |
|
|
Rural |
3429791 |
1723762 |
1706029 |
|
|
Urban |
819196 |
410992 |
408204 |
27 |
Goa |
Total |
149275 |
72948 |
76327 |
|
|
Rural |
87639 |
43263 |
44376 |
|
|
Urban |
61636 |
29685 |
31951 |
28 |
Lakshadweep |
Total |
61120 |
30515 |
30605 |
|
|
Rural |
13463 |
6752 |
6711 |
|
|
Urban |
47657 |
23763 |
23894 |
29 |
Kerala |
Total |
484839 |
238203 |
246636 |
|
|
Rural |
433092 |
213208 |
219884 |
|
|
Urban |
51747 |
24995 |
26752 |
30 |
TamilNadu |
Total |
794697 |
401068 |
393629 |
|
|
Rural |
660280 |
333178 |
327102 |
|
|
Urban |
134417 |
67890 |
66527 |
31 |
Andman & Nicobar Islands |
Total |
28530 |
14731 |
13799 |
|
Rural |
26715 |
13837 |
12878 |
|
|
Urban |
1815 |
894 |
921 |
Further, the States / UTs ranked by proportion of STs, as per Census 2011 are given in (Table-25).
Sex Ratio:
The sex ratio in respect of STs is 990, which is higher than national average of 943. Also, ST sex ratio has improved from 978 females per 1000 males in 2001 to 990 in 2011. Goa, Kerala, Arunachal Pradesh, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, etc., have shown high ST sex ratio while Jammu & Kashmir has shown the lowest ST sex ratio at 924 in 2011. State / UT wise ST sex ratio in 2001 and 2011, by residence, are given in (Table-36). Child sex ratio in respect of STs in 0-6 age group has declined from 972 in 2001 to 957 in 2011. However, ST Child sex ratio is higher as compared to child sex ratio for general population at 914 girls to 1000 boys.
TABLE-2 STATES/UTS RANKED BY PROPORTION OF STS: CENSUS 2011
Bottom 5 States/UTs |
Top 5 States/UTs |
||
Uttar Pradesh |
0.6% |
Lakshadweep |
94.8% |
Tamil Nadu |
1.1% |
Mizoram |
94.4% |
Bihar |
1.3% |
Nagaland |
86.5% |
Kerala |
1.5% |
Meghalaya |
86.1% |
Uttarakhand |
2.9% |
Arunachal Pradesh |
68.8% |
TABLE-3 GENDER COMPOSITION OF SCHEDULED TRIBE POPULATION
State/UT |
SEX RATIO 2001 |
SEX RATIO 2011 |
||||
Total |
Rural |
Urban |
Total |
Rural |
Urban |
|
India |
978 |
981 |
944 |
990 |
991 |
980 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
910 |
916 |
799 |
924 |
927 |
872 |
Himachal Pradesh |
996 |
1002 |
809 |
999 |
1003 |
923 |
Uttarakhand |
950 |
956 |
867 |
963 |
966 |
938 |
Rajasthan |
944 |
950 |
851 |
948 |
951 |
893 |
Uttar Pradesh |
934 |
945 |
850 |
952 |
959 |
884 |
Bihar |
929 |
934 |
839 |
958 |
960 |
934 |
Sikkim |
957 |
950 |
1024 |
960 |
942 |
1042 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
1003 |
1000 |
1020 |
1032 |
1022 |
1083 |
Nagaland |
943 |
942 |
946 |
976 |
964 |
1014 |
Manipur |
980 |
977 |
1040 |
984 |
978 |
1051 |
Mizoram |
984 |
959 |
1012 |
1007 |
967 |
1047 |
Tripura |
970 |
971 |
921 |
983 |
982 |
1017 |
Meghalaya |
1000 |
987 |
1072 |
1013 |
996 |
1104 |
Assam |
972 |
974 |
929 |
985 |
984 |
996 |
West Bengal |
982 |
984 |
950 |
999 |
1000 |
991 |
Jharkhand |
987 |
989 |
965 |
1003 |
1003 |
1007 |
Odisha |
1003 |
1006 |
948 |
1029 |
1031 |
991 |
Chhattisgarh |
1013 |
1017 |
941 |
1020 |
1021 |
999 |
Madhya Pradesh |
975 |
979 |
912 |
984 |
986 |
956 |
Gujarat |
974 |
978 |
926 |
981 |
984 |
952 |
Daman & Diu |
947 |
952 |
928 |
977 |
982 |
972 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli |
1028 |
1032 |
973 |
1010 |
1011 |
1002 |
Maharashtra |
973 |
979 |
931 |
977 |
984 |
942 |
Telangana |
962 |
965 |
922 |
980 |
982 |
961 |
Andhra Pradesh |
983 |
986 |
957 |
1009 |
1014 |
977 |
Karnataka |
972 |
975 |
960 |
990 |
990 |
993 |
Goa |
893 |
827 |
928 |
1046 |
1026 |
1076 |
Lakshadweep |
1003 |
1001 |
1006 |
1003 |
994 |
1006 |
Kerala |
1021 |
1020 |
1053 |
1035 |
1031 |
1070 |
Tamil Nadu |
980 |
977 |
997 |
981 |
982 |
980 |
A & N Islands |
948 |
954 |
796 |
937 |
931 |
1030 |
Literacy Rate:
As per Census figures, literacy rate for STs in India improved from 47.1% in 2001 to 59% in 2011.
Figure 2 GAPS IN LITERACY RATES CENSUS 1991, 2001 AND 2011
Among ST males, literacy rate increased from 59.2% to 68.5% and among ST females, literacy rate increased from 34.8% to 49.4% during the same period. Literacy rate for the total population has increased from 64.8% in 2001 to 73% in 2011. There is a gap of about 14 percentage points in literacy rate of STs as compared to the all India literacy rate. The gaps in literacy rates in respect of persons, males and females for the years 1991, 2001 and 2011, as depicted in Figure-2, show progressive decline. Literacy Rates based on Census 1961 onwards are given below in (Table-4) 6.
TABLE-4 LITERACY RATES AMONG STS AND ALL
All |
Scheduled Tribes |
|||||
Persons |
Males |
Females |
Persons |
Males |
Females |
|
1961 |
28.30 |
40.40 |
15.35 |
8.35 |
13.83 |
3.16 |
1971 |
34.45 |
45.96 |
21.97 |
11.30 |
17.63 |
4.85 |
1981 |
43.57 |
56.38 |
29.76 |
16.35 |
24.52 |
8.04 |
1991 |
52.21 |
64.13 |
39.29 |
29.60 |
40.65 |
18.19 |
2001 |
64.84 |
75.26 |
53.67 |
47.10 |
59.17 |
34.76 |
2011 |
73.00 |
80.90 |
64.60 |
59.00 |
68.50 |
49.40 |
The details of State / UT wise literacy rates of all population, ST population and gaps are given in (Table-5) 6.
TABLE-5 LITERACY RATES OFALL POPULATION, ST POPULATION AND GAPS CENSUS 2011
Sl. No |
State /UT |
Persons |
Male |
Female |
||||||
All |
ST |
Gap |
All |
ST |
Gap |
All |
ST |
Gap |
||
|
INDIA |
73 |
59 |
14.0 |
80.9 |
68.5 |
12.4 |
64.6 |
49.4 |
15.2 |
1 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
67.2 |
50.6 |
16.6 |
76.8 |
60.6 |
16.2 |
56.4 |
39.7 |
16.7 |
2 |
Himachal Pradesh |
82.8 |
73.6 |
9.2 |
89.5 |
83.2 |
6.3 |
75.9 |
64.2 |
11.7 |
3 |
Uttarakhand |
78.8 |
73.9 |
4.9 |
87.4 |
83.6 |
3.8 |
70 |
63.9 |
6.1 |
4 |
Rajasthan |
66.1 |
52.8 |
13.3 |
79.2 |
67.6 |
11.6 |
52.1 |
37.3 |
14.8 |
5 |
Uttar Pradesh |
67.7 |
55.7 |
12.0 |
77.3 |
67.1 |
10.2 |
57.2 |
43.7 |
13.5 |
6 |
Bihar |
61.8 |
51.1 |
10.7 |
71.2 |
61.3 |
9.9 |
51.5 |
40.4 |
11.1 |
7 |
Sikkim |
81.4 |
79.7 |
1.7 |
86.6 |
85 |
1.6 |
75.6 |
74.3 |
1.3 |
8 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
65.4 |
64.6 |
0.8 |
72.6 |
71.5 |
1.1 |
57.7 |
58 |
-0.3 |
9 |
Nagaland |
79.6 |
80 |
-0.4 |
82.8 |
83.1 |
-0.3 |
76.1 |
76.9 |
-0.8 |
10 |
Manipur |
76.9 |
72.6 |
4.3 |
83.6 |
77.3 |
6.3 |
70.3 |
67.8 |
2.5 |
11 |
Mizoram |
91.3 |
91.5 |
-0.2 |
93.3 |
93.6 |
-0.3 |
89.3 |
89.5 |
-0.2 |
12 |
Tripura |
87.2 |
79.1 |
8.1 |
91.5 |
86.4 |
5.1 |
82.7 |
71.6 |
11.1 |
13 |
Meghalaya |
74.4 |
74.5 |
-0.1 |
76 |
75.5 |
0.5 |
72.9 |
73.5 |
-0.6 |
14 |
Assam |
72.2 |
72.1 |
0.1 |
77.8 |
79 |
-1.2 |
66.3 |
65.1 |
1.2 |
15 |
West Bengal |
76.3 |
57.9 |
18.4 |
81.7 |
68.2 |
13.5 |
70.5 |
47.7 |
22.8 |
16 |
Jharkhand |
66.4 |
57.1 |
9.3 |
76.8 |
68.2 |
8.6 |
55.4 |
46.2 |
9.2 |
17 |
Odisha |
72.9 |
52.2 |
20.7 |
81.6 |
63.7 |
17.9 |
64 |
41.2 |
22.8 |
18 |
Chhattisgarh |
70.3 |
59.1 |
11.2 |
80.3 |
69.7 |
10.6 |
60.2 |
48.8 |
11.4 |
19 |
Madhya Pradesh |
69.3 |
50.6 |
18.7 |
78.7 |
59.6 |
19.1 |
59.2 |
41.5 |
17.7 |
20 |
Gujarat |
78 |
62.5 |
15.5 |
85.8 |
71.7 |
14.1 |
69.7 |
53.2 |
16.5 |
21 |
Daman & Diu |
87.1 |
78.8 |
8.3 |
91.5 |
86.2 |
5.3 |
79.5 |
71.2 |
8.3 |
22 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli |
76.2 |
61.9 |
14.3 |
85.2 |
73.6 |
11.6 |
64.3 |
50.3 |
14 |
23 |
Maharashtra |
82.3 |
65.7 |
16.6 |
88.4 |
74.3 |
14.1 |
75.9 |
57 |
18.9 |
24 |
Telangana |
66.5 |
49.5 |
17.0 |
75 |
59.5 |
15.5 |
57.9 |
39.4 |
18.5 |
25 |
Andhra Pradesh |
67.4 |
48.8 |
18.6 |
74.8 |
56.9 |
17.9 |
60 |
40.9 |
19.1 |
26 |
Karnataka |
75.4 |
62.1 |
13.3 |
82.5 |
71.1 |
11.4 |
68.1 |
53 |
15.1 |
27 |
Goa |
88.7 |
79.1 |
9.6 |
92.6 |
87.2 |
5.4 |
84.7 |
71.5 |
13.2 |
28 |
Lakshadweep |
91.8 |
91.7 |
0.1 |
95.6 |
95.7 |
-0.1 |
87.9 |
87.8 |
0.1 |
29 |
Kerala |
94 |
75.8 |
18.2 |
96.1 |
80.8 |
15.3 |
92.1 |
71.1 |
21 |
30 |
Tamil Nadu |
80.1 |
54.3 |
25.8 |
86.8 |
61.8 |
25 |
73.4 |
46.8 |
26.6 |
31 |
A & N Islands |
86.6 |
75.6 |
11.0 |
90.3 |
80.9 |
9.4 |
82.4 |
69.9 |
12.5 |
All India and State / UT wise details of education level - graduate and above for STs, age 15 years and above as per Census 2011 are given in (Table-65). Literacy rate at all India level for different categories (all ages, age between 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, adolescent (10-19) and youth (15-24) classified for India, gender-wise, for total population and SC / ST in 2011 are given in (Table-7) 6.
TABLE-6 EDUCATIONAL LEVEL-GRADUATE AND ABOVE FOR SCHEDULED TRIBES AGE 15 AND ABOVE
Sl. No |
India / State/UT |
|
Percentage of Total Graduate and Above (Col. 3) |
|||||||
Total Graduate and Above |
Graduate degree other than technical degree |
Post-graduate other than technical degree |
Technical degree or diploma equal to degree or post graduate degree |
|||||||
Engineering and technology |
Medicine |
Agriculture and dairying |
Veterinary |
Teaching * |
Others |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
INDIA |
1763879 |
64.08 |
18.28 |
5.92 |
1.94 |
0.36 |
0.11 |
9.27 |
0.04 |
1 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
19320 |
55.01 |
22.51 |
7.16 |
3.98 |
0.61 |
0.45 |
10.09 |
0.20 |
2 |
Himachal Pradesh |
16983 |
57.57 |
27.58 |
4.57 |
1.74 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
8.20 |
0.05 |
3 |
Uttarakhand |
18868 |
61.74 |
28.87 |
4.43 |
1.35 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
3.40 |
0.00 |
4 |
Rajasthan |
199280 |
52.83 |
22.17 |
3.14 |
1.20 |
0.11 |
0.06 |
20.49 |
0.01 |
5 |
Uttar Pradesh |
18275 |
71.22 |
19.62 |
3.64 |
1.00 |
0.20 |
0.01 |
4.31 |
0.00 |
6 |
Bihar |
12772 |
83.34 |
9.02 |
4.60 |
1.43 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
1.46 |
0.01 |
7 |
Sikkim |
9401 |
71.71 |
16.93 |
5.94 |
2.60 |
0.55 |
0.20 |
2.01 |
0.06 |
8 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
33331 |
70.94 |
13.40 |
8.99 |
3.32 |
1.03 |
0.36 |
1.94 |
0.02 |
9 |
Nagaland |
75326 |
75.44 |
15.18 |
4.25 |
2.22 |
0.68 |
0.28 |
1.92 |
0.03 |
10 |
Manipur |
60186 |
82.04 |
12.68 |
2.62 |
1.61 |
0.15 |
0.04 |
0.85 |
0.01 |
11 |
Mizoram |
45681 |
70.62 |
16.57 |
5.51 |
2.43 |
0.48 |
0.38 |
4.01 |
0.02 |
12 |
Tripura |
12074 |
72.58 |
15.83 |
5.47 |
3.35 |
0.80 |
0.15 |
1.81 |
0.02 |
13 |
Meghalaya |
63897 |
73.85 |
13.05 |
5.59 |
2.47 |
0.61 |
0.28 |
4.13 |
0.03 |
14 |
Assam |
74746 |
83.24 |
9.80 |
3.93 |
1.66 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
15 |
West Bengal |
62032 |
79.85 |
13.50 |
3.00 |
1.03 |
0.12 |
0.04 |
2.44 |
0.01 |
16 |
Jharkhand |
144262 |
79.58 |
12.76 |
2.62 |
0.95 |
0.13 |
0.06 |
3.90 |
0.01 |
17 |
Odisha |
64859 |
71.23 |
9.64 |
14.56 |
1.24 |
0.14 |
0.06 |
3.13 |
0.00 |
18 |
Chhattisgarh |
109384 |
54.98 |
37.76 |
4.09 |
1.39 |
0.38 |
0.05 |
1.35 |
0.01 |
19 |
Madhya Pradesh |
121374 |
59.30 |
32.64 |
4.72 |
1.41 |
0.37 |
0.05 |
1.51 |
0.00 |
20 |
Gujarat |
133702 |
56.13 |
19.54 |
5.11 |
3.11 |
0.38 |
0.05 |
15.55 |
0.13 |
21 |
Daman & Diu |
170 |
63.53 |
14.71 |
7.06 |
3.53 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
11.18 |
0.00 |
22 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli |
2232 |
38.22 |
12.90 |
4.57 |
4.17 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
40.10 |
0.04 |
23 |
Maharashtra |
185590 |
55.83 |
15.81 |
5.78 |
2.33 |
0.87 |
0.09 |
19.28 |
0.01 |
24 |
Andhra Pradesh |
63124 |
57.36 |
13.61 |
10.52 |
2.75 |
0.27 |
0.14 |
15.11 |
0.24 |
25 |
Telangana |
83954 |
56.08 |
14.55 |
13.17 |
2.89 |
0.17 |
0.11 |
12.88 |
0.15 |
26 |
Karnataka |
102014 |
57.84 |
12.29 |
10.82 |
1.95 |
0.30 |
0.09 |
16.68 |
0.03 |
27 |
Goa |
3990 |
77.57 |
8.47 |
6.24 |
3.48 |
0.18 |
0.00 |
4.06 |
0.00 |
28 |
Lakshadweep |
1986 |
44.66 |
21.70 |
8.61 |
5.09 |
1.71 |
0.45 |
17.12 |
0.65 |
29 |
Kerala |
10675 |
62.49 |
17.80 |
8.51 |
4.14 |
0.36 |
0.24 |
6.41 |
0.06 |
30 |
Tamil Nadu |
13970 |
49.20 |
20.76 |
20.08 |
2.66 |
0.46 |
0.19 |
6.63 |
0.03 |
31 |
A & N Islands |
421 |
46.32 |
17.10 |
3.33 |
5.23 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
27.32 |
0.00 |
*Teaching–Junior Basic Training (JBT),B.Ed., M.Ed., etc.
TABLE-7 LITERACY RATE
All categories (age groups) |
Total |
Scheduled Caste |
Scheduled Tribe |
||||||
Persons |
Male |
Female |
Person |
Male |
Female |
Person |
Male |
Female |
|
All Ages |
73.0 |
80.9 |
64.6 |
66.1 |
75.2 |
56.5 |
59.0 |
68.5 |
49.4 |
10-14 |
91.1 |
92.2 |
90.0 |
90.3 |
91.5 |
89.0 |
86.4 |
88.3 |
84.4 |
15-19 |
88.8 |
91.2 |
86.2 |
87.1 |
89.7 |
84.1 |
80.2 |
85.7 |
74.6 |
20-24 |
83.2 |
88.8 |
77.3 |
79.1 |
86.2 |
71.6 |
69.2 |
79.6 |
59.0 |
Adolescent (10-19) |
90.0 |
91.7 |
88.2 |
88.8 |
90.6 |
86.8 |
83.6 |
87.1 |
79.9 |
Youth (15-24) |
86.1 |
90.0 |
81.8 |
83.3 |
88.1 |
78.0 |
75.0 |
82.9 |
67.1 |
Gender Parity Index (GPI) for Scheduled Tribe students has shown improvement at Secondary and Senior Secondary levels as well as at Higher Education level. Data are given in (Table-87,8).
TABLE-8 GENDER PARITY INDEX (GPI) FOR SCHEDULED TRIBE STUDENTS
Level /Year |
Secondary (IX-X) |
Senior Secondary (XI-XII) |
Higher Education |
2013-14 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
0.81 |
2014-15 |
1.01 |
0.95 |
0.81 |
2015-16 |
1.02 |
0.97 |
0.83 |
2016-17 |
NA |
NA |
0.85 |
Health Indicators:
As per National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4, conducted by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare during 2015-169, status of Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR) and anaemia in women for STs as well as all categories are shown in Figure-3.
Figure-3 HEALTH INDICATORS: NFHS-4 (2015-16)
Health Infrastructure in Tribal Areas:
As per the figures pertaining to the Rural Health Infrastructure in Tribal Areas, published by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, there are 28200 Sub Centres (SCs), 4024 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 1028 Community Health Centres (CHCs) in position as on 31st March, 2017. The number of existing Sub Centres has increased by 242, PHCs by 67 and CHCs by 30 in 2017 over 2015. At all India level, there is a shortfall of 6503 SCs, 1240 PHCs and 273 CHCs in tribal areas as on 31st March 2017 as compared to requirement. Further, there is a huge shortfall in number of Sub-Centres in Madhya Pradesh (1806), Rajasthan (1239), Maharashtra (945), Karnataka (822) and Odisha (309). There is a shortfall of 381 PHCs in Madhya Pradesh (MP), followed by 228 in Jharkhand and 225 in Rajasthan. In case of CHCs, MP shows maximum shortfall (74), followed by Maharashtra (45) and Rajasthan (43). The requirement is calculated using the prescribed norms for rural health care infrastructure, given in (Table-910).
TABLE-9 RURAL HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE
Centre |
Population Norms |
|
Plain Area |
Hilly/Tribal/Difficult Area |
|
Sub Centre |
5000 |
3000 |
Primary Health Centre |
30,000 |
20,000 |
Community Health Centre |
1,20,000 |
80,000 |
Poverty Estimates:
The erstwhile Planning Commission provided estimates based on Tendulkar Methodology for poverty ratios for the years for which large Sample Surveys on Household Consumer Expenditure have been conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation11. As per these estimates, ST people living below the poverty line in 2011-12 were 45.3% in the rural areas and 24.1% in the urban areas as compared to 25.7% persons in rural areas and 13.7% persons in urban areas below poverty line for all population. State-wise details for the years 2009-10 and 2011-12 are given in (Table-10).
TABLE-10 PERCENTAGE OF ST POPULATION BELOW POVERTY LINE DURING 2009-10 AND 2011-12 (TENDULKAR METHODOLOGY)
S.No. |
State |
Rural |
Urban |
||
2009-10 |
2011-12 |
2009-10 |
2011-12 |
||
1 |
Andhra Pradesh |
40.2 |
24.1 |
21.2 |
12.1 |
2 |
Assam |
32.0 |
33.4 |
29.2 |
15.6 |
3 |
Bihar |
64.4 |
59.3 |
16.5 |
10.3 |
4 |
Chhattisgarh |
66.8 |
52.6 |
28.6 |
35.2 |
5 |
Gujarat |
48.6 |
36.5 |
32.2 |
30.1 |
6 |
Himachal Pradesh |
22.0 |
9.5 |
19.6 |
4.0 |
7 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
3.1 |
16.3 |
15.0 |
3.0 |
8 |
Jharkhand |
51.5 |
51.6 |
49.5 |
28.7 |
9 |
Karnataka |
21.3 |
30.8 |
35.6 |
33.7 |
10 |
Kerala |
24.4 |
41.0 |
5.0 |
13.6 |
11 |
Madhya Pradesh |
61.9 |
55.3 |
41.6 |
32.3 |
12 |
Maharashtra |
51.7 |
61.6 |
32.4 |
23.3 |
13 |
Odisha |
66.0 |
63.5 |
34.1 |
39.7 |
14 |
Rajasthan |
35.9 |
41.4 |
28.9 |
21.7 |
15 |
Tamil Nadu |
11.5 |
36.8 |
17.6 |
2.8 |
16 |
Uttar Pradesh |
49.8 |
27.0 |
20.2 |
16.3 |
17 |
Uttarakhand |
20.0 |
11.9 |
0 |
25.7 |
18 |
West Bengal |
32.9 |
50.1 |
20.6 |
44.5 |
|
AllIndia |
47.4 |
45.3 |
30.4 |
24.1 |
Percentage of ST Households and their Source of Lighting–a comparative picture of ST and All categories:
As per Census 20115, the all India picture shows that Electricity is the main source of lighting, for ST households and all households followed by use of Kerosene. In Lakshadweep, 99.7% households have Electricity as the main source of lighting. It is followed by Daman and Diu (96.6%), Himachal Pradesh (94.5%), Andaman and Nicobar Islands (94%) and Goa (93.8%). In North Eastern States, among the ST households, Electricity is the main source of lighting. Sikkim is the highest (91.5%) followed by Mizoram (84.3%) and Nagaland (81.2%). Bihar and Odisha show a grim picture, with only 11.5% ST households (lowest) in Bihar having Electricity as against 16.4% of all households and Odisha with 15.6% ST households as against 43% all households. ST households in Bihar and Odisha are highest users of Kerosene.
Percentage of ST Households by the condition of Census houses occupied by them–comparative picture of ST and All categories:
As per Census 20115, 40.6% ST households are seen to be having good houses as against 53% of total households. The highest number of ST households having good houses (87%) is seen in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Among the lowest in this category is Odisha with 19% ST households having good houses followed by West Bengal 28%, Bihar and Rajasthan 31% each and Assam 32%. At the all India level, 53.7% ST households as against61.3% of all households are having separate kitchen inside the houses. The highest number of ST households in this category is seen in Andaman and Nicobar Islands (97.9%) followed by Nagaland(96.8%), Lakshadweep (96.6%) Sikkim (91.7%),Meghalaya (91.2%) and Goa (90.2%).There are 7States falling below the all India percentage, the lowest being Rajasthan (22.1%) followed by Bihar(34.4%), Jharkhand (34.5%), Madhya Pradesh(36.6%), Andhra Pradesh (37.8%), Uttar Pradesh(43.0%) and West Bengal (48.2%) having kitchen inside the houses of the ST households.
Percentage of ST Households by location of main source of drinking water:
According to Census 20115 data, it is seen that while almost 47 percent of all households in the country have drinking water facilities within their premises, less than 20% of the ST households enjoy this convenience. More than one third of the ST households have to spend time and energy fetching drinking water from far away sources as against only about 18% of all households at all India level. State / UT wise details are given in (Table-11).
TABLE-11 HOUSEHOLDS BY LOCATION OF THE MAIN SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER
State/UT |
% of Households (all) |
(%) ST Households |
||||
By Location of the Main Source of Drinking Water |
||||||
Within the premises |
Near the premises |
Away |
Within the premises |
Near the remises |
Away |
|
India |
46.6 |
35.8 |
17.6 |
19.7 |
46.7 |
33.6 |
A&N Islands |
60.6 |
27.0 |
12.4 |
61.0 |
15.7 |
23.3 |
Andhra Pradesh |
43.2 |
37.3 |
19.5 |
21.0 |
45.7 |
33.4 |
Arunachal Pradesh |
41.1 |
37.4 |
21.6 |
36.5 |
40.4 |
23.1 |
Assam |
54.8 |
26.7 |
18.5 |
47.3 |
28.9 |
23.8 |
Bihar |
50.1 |
37.9 |
12.0 |
40.9 |
41.4 |
17.7 |
Chandigarh |
86.1 |
11.6 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Chhattisgarh |
19.0 |
54.5 |
26.5 |
9.1 |
57.7 |
33.2 |
Dadra & Nagar Haveli |
52.6 |
36.4 |
10.9 |
28.7 |
50.2 |
21.0 |
Daman & Diu |
76.4 |
22.1 |
1.5 |
57.6 |
36.9 |
5.5 |
Goa |
79.7 |
15.5 |
4.8 |
58.7 |
28.9 |
12.4 |
Gujarat |
64.0 |
23.5 |
12.4 |
28.8 |
46.4 |
24.8 |
Haryana |
66.5 |
21.4 |
12.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Himachal Pradesh |
55.5 |
35.0 |
9.5 |
48.9 |
41.2 |
9.9 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
48.2 |
28.7 |
23.1 |
15.3 |
39.2 |
45.5 |
Jharkhand |
23.2 |
44.9 |
31.9 |
8.3 |
49.4 |
42.3 |
Karnataka |
44.5 |
37.3 |
18.2 |
27.2 |
45.6 |
27.2 |
Kerala |
77.7 |
14.1 |
8.2 |
44.3 |
30.4 |
25.4 |
Lakshadweep |
83.7 |
14.3 |
2.0 |
83.9 |
14.2 |
1.9 |
Madhya Pradesh |
23.9 |
45.6 |
30.5 |
8.4 |
50.1 |
41.5 |
Maharashtra |
59.4 |
27.5 |
13.1 |
33.9 |
43.3 |
22.8 |
Manipur |
16.1 |
46.2 |
37.8 |
13.3 |
52.9 |
33.8 |
Meghalaya |
24.1 |
43.2 |
32.7 |
18.8 |
46.2 |
35.0 |
Mizoram |
31.2 |
46.7 |
22.2 |
30.6 |
47.0 |
22.4 |
Nagaland |
29.3 |
42.4 |
28.3 |
26.1 |
44.1 |
29.8 |
NCT of Delhi |
78.4 |
15.4 |
6.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Odisha |
22.4 |
42.2 |
35.4 |
6.2 |
49.2 |
44.6 |
Puducherry |
77.4 |
21.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Punjab |
85.9 |
10.0 |
4.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Rajasthan |
35.0 |
39.0 |
25.9 |
11.0 |
47.5 |
41.5 |
Sikkim |
52.6 |
29.7 |
17.7 |
48.8 |
31.7 |
19.5 |
Tamil Nadu |
34.9 |
58.1 |
7.0 |
21.1 |
65.9 |
13.0 |
Tripura |
37.1 |
30.5 |
32.4 |
14.2 |
32.2 |
53.6 |
Uttar Pradesh |
51.9 |
36.0 |
12.1 |
43.0 |
38.8 |
18.2 |
Uttarakhand |
58.3 |
26.6 |
15.2 |
55.8 |
31.1 |
13.1 |
West Bengal |
38.6 |
34.7 |
26.6 |
18.6 |
44.3 |
37.1 |
Employment:
Worker Population Ratio (WPR)
As per the fifth Annual Employment-Unemployment Survey 2015-16, conducted by Ministry of Labour and Employment, the Worker Population Ratio (WPR) for different social groups based on Usual Principal Status (UPS) approach and Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (UPSS) approach are given in (Table-1212). At the All India level, WPR was the highest under Scheduled Tribe category with 54.2% followed by 50.6% under the Scheduled Caste category, 47.8% for Other Backward Class category and 44.0% for others category based on Usual Principle Status (UPS) approach.
TABLE-12 WORKER POPULATION RATIO
All India (in percent)
Approach |
Scheduled Caste |
Scheduled Tribe |
OBC |
Others |
UPS |
50.6 |
54.2 |
47.8 |
44.0 |
UPSS |
53.7 |
60.0 |
50.4 |
45.5 |
The unemployment rate signifies the proportion of persons who are available for work, but did not get work during the reference period. Based on the Usual Principal Status (UPS) approach, the unemployment rate at the All India level was 5.2% for Other Backward Class category which was highest among all four social groups. In case of Scheduled Caste and Others category, the unemployment was estimated to be 5.0% each. The lowest unemployment rate was recorded as 4.4 % under Scheduled Tribe category.
Women Empowerment:
The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles. The Constitution not only grants equality to women, but also empowers the State to adopt measures of positive discrimination in favour of women. Empowerment is seen as a process by which the ones without power gain greater control over their lives. This means control over material assets, intellectual resources and ideology. It involves power to, power with and power within. Some define empowerment as a process of awareness and conscientization, of capacity building leading to greater participation, effective decision-making power and control leading to transformative action. This involves ability to get what one wants and to influence others on our concerns. With reference to women, the power relation that has to be involved includes their lives at multiple levels - family, community, market and the state. Importantly, it involves at the psychological level - women’s ability to assert them and this is constructed by the ‘gender roles’ assigned to her especially in a cultural setup which resists change like India.
Domestic violence against women:
Violence against women is present in every country, cutting across boundaries of culture, class, education, income, ethnicity and age. Specific groups of women are more vulnerable, including minority groups, indigenous and migrant women, refugee women and those in situations of armed conflict, women in institutions and detention, women with disabilities, female children, and elderly women. Domestic violence is the most prevalent yet relatively hidden and ignored form of violence against women and girls. Violence against women has serious consequences for their mental and physical well-being including their reproductive and sexual health9. One of the most common forms of violence against women worldwide is abuse by a husband. Women Empowerment and Domestic Violence Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India 2013 shows that prevalence of violence is much higher among women belonging to STs and SCs than among women who do not belong to these categories. While variation in violence during the 12 months preceding the survey by different social group pattern, the differentials is much smaller as shown in Figure-4.
Figure-4 Women who have experienced Domestic Violence14
Crimes Committed against ST Population in India:
As per data released by National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)13, Ministry of Home Affairs, Madhya Pradesh (1823 cases) reported the highest number of cases of atrocities against Scheduled Tribes (STs) accounting for 27.8% followed by Rajasthan with 18.2% (1195 cases) and Odisha with 10.4 % (681 cases) during 2016. State /UT wise details are given in (Table-13).
TABLE-13 CRIMES/ATROCITIES AGAINST STS
Crime Head |
Crime Incidence |
Crime Rate |
||||
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
|
Atrocities Against STs |
6827 |
6276 |
6568 |
6.5 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
India is committed to the welfare and development of its people in general and of vulnerable sections of society in particular. Equality of status and opportunity to all citizens of the country is guaranteed by the Constitution of India, which also provides that no individual shall be discriminated against on the grounds of religion, caste or sex, etc. Fundamental Rights and other specific provisions, namely, Articles 38, 39 and 46 in the Constitution of India1 stand testimony to the commitment of the State towards its people. The strategy of the State is to secure distributive justice and allocation of resources to support programmes for social, economic and educational advancement of the weaker sections in general and those of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in particular. The Scheduled Tribes in India have not remained untouched from various crimes. They have been victims of countless crimes, both because of their gullibility and lack of hearing of their grievances. Looking at the year wise comparative data on the crimes committed against Scheduled Tribes, from 2006 to 2012, it is seen that: Murders decreased from 2006 to 2010 but increased in the year 2011 and 2012.The increase in murders in 2012 was about 9.09% over the year 2011. Rapes decreased from 2006 to 2009 but increased in 2010 and 2011. However a marginal fall of 5.57% was noticed in 2012 over 2011. Similar trend was seen in case of kidnappings and abductions with a sharp decline of 24.82% in 2012. Dacoity also registered a fall of 28.57% in 2012 over 2011 while robbery rose13.
Major ST Communities:
There are over 700 Scheduled Tribe communities spread over different States and Union Territories of the country. Within ST population, some ST communities count each more than 5%population in every State. These have been identified and compiled State/UT wise. In 31 States/UTs, out of more than 700 Scheduled Tribe communities, 111 communities count each 5% (of ST population of concerned State/UT). These 111 communities add up to 803.25 lakhs, i.e., 76.8%of total ST population18,19.
TABLE-14 CASES REGISTERED UNDER CRIMES AGAINST STS IN INDIA DURING 2001-2012
S. No. |
Crime |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
% variation of 2012 over 2011 |
1 |
Murder |
195 |
140 |
124 |
122 |
124 |
143 |
156 |
9.09 |
2 |
Rape |
699 |
627 |
585 |
589 |
640 |
772 |
729 |
-5.57 |
3 |
Kidnapping and Abduction |
88 |
89 |
87 |
66 |
69 |
137 |
103 |
-24.82 |
4 |
Dacoity |
12 |
9 |
13 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
-28.57 |
5 |
Robbery |
29 |
21 |
17 |
22 |
5 |
9 |
15 |
66.67 |
6 |
Arson |
46 |
54 |
46 |
27 |
33 |
24 |
26 |
8.33 |
7 |
Hurt |
838 |
855 |
777 |
715 |
917 |
803 |
816 |
1.62 |
8 |
Other Crimes Against STs |
2603 |
2628 |
2855 |
2882 |
2927 |
2700 |
2759 |
2.19 |
9 |
Protection of Civil Rights Act |
49 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
-71.43 |
10 |
SC/ST (POA) Act |
1232 |
1104 |
882 |
822 |
1037 |
1154 |
1311 |
13.60 |
|
Total Crimes against STs |
5791 |
5532 |
5392 |
5250 |
5764 |
5756 |
5922 |
2.88 |
SCHEDULED AREAS:
The Scheduled Tribes mostly live in contiguous areas unlike other communities. It is, therefore, much simpler to have an area approach for development activities as well as regulatory provisions to protect their interests. In order to protect the interests of Scheduled Tribes with regard to land and other social issues various provisions have been enshrined in the Fifth Schedule and the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution11.
Criteria for Declaration of Scheduled Areas:
Criteria for declaring any area as a “Scheduled Area” under the Fifth Schedule are:
(i) Preponderance of tribal population,
(ii) Compactness and reasonable size of the area,
(iii) A viable administrative entity such as a district, block or taluk, and
(iv) Economic backwardness of the area as compared to the neighbouring areas. The above criteria for declaration of Scheduled Areas are as such not spelt out in the Constitution, but have become well established.
Fifth Schedule:
The Fifth Schedule under Article 244 (1) of the Constitution contains provisions regarding administration of Scheduled Areas other than in Northeast India. The provisions of Section 6 of Part C of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution are as follows: “Scheduled Areas–(1) In this Constitution, the expression "Scheduled Areas" means such areas as the President may by order declare to be Scheduled Areas.
Sixth Schedule:
The Sixth Schedule under Article 244 (2) and 275 (1) of the Constitution provisions as to the administration of Tribal Areas in the States of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. It also provisions for autonomous districts and autonomous regions in such areas. The subject matter relating to Sixth Schedule comes under purview of Ministry of Home Affairs.
The President may at any time by order- (a) direct that the whole or any specified part of a Scheduled Area shall cease to be a Scheduled Area or a part of such an area; (aa) increase the area of any Scheduled Area in a State after consultation with the Governor of that State; (b) alter, but only by way of rectification of boundaries, any Scheduled Area; (c) on any alteration of the boundaries of a State or on the admission into the Union or the establishment of a new State, declare any territory not previously included in any State to be, or to form part of, a Scheduled Area; (d) rescind, in relation to any State or States, any order or orders made under this paragraph, and in consultation with the Governor of the State concerned, make fresh orders redefining the areas which are to be Scheduled Areas; and any such order may contain such incidental and consequential provisions as appear to the President to be necessary and proper, but save as aforesaid, the order made under sub-paragraph (1) of this paragraph shall not be varied by any subsequent order.
Coverage of Scheduled Areas:
At present, Scheduled Areas have been declared in the States of Andhra Pradesh (including Telangana), Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha and Rajasthan.
Law Applicable to Scheduled Areas:
Provisions of Para 5 of Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, relating to role of the Governor of a State, which has Scheduled Areas, are given below: “(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the Governor may by public notification direct that any particular Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State shall not apply to a Scheduled Area or any part thereof in the State or shall apply to a Scheduled Area or any part thereof in the State subject to such exceptions and modifications as he may specify in the notification and any direction given under this sub-paragraph may be given so as to have retrospective effect. (2) The Governor may make regulations for the peace and good government of any area in a State which is for the time being a Scheduled Area. In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may - (a) prohibit or restrict the transfer of land by or among members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area; (b) regulate the allotment of land to members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area; (c) regulate the carrying on of business as money-lender by persons who lend money to members of the Scheduled Tribes in such area. (3) In making any such regulation as is referred to in sub-paragraph (2) of this paragraph, the Governor may repeal or amend any Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State or any existing law which is for the time being applicable to the area in question. (4) All regulations made under this paragraph shall be submitted forthwith to the President and, until assented to by him, shall have no effect. (5) No regulation shall be made under this paragraph unless the Governor making the regulation has, in the case where there is a Tribes Advisory Council for the State, consulted such Council.”
Reports by the Governor to the President:
In accordance with the provisions of Part A, Para 3 of Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, the Governor of each State having Scheduled Areas therein shall annually, or whenever so required by the President, make a report to the President regarding the administration of the Scheduled Areas in that State and the executive power of the Union shall extend to the giving of directions to the State as to the administration of the said area. As per Constitutional provision, States having Scheduled Areas, viz., Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana are required to submit Governor’s Report annually.
CONCLUSION:
Indian Scheduled Tribes are the group of tribal communities and was given the name Scheduled Tribes during the post-Independence period, under the rule of Indian Constitution. The primary criteria adopted for delimiting Indian backward communities as Scheduled Tribes includes, traditional occupation of a definitive geographical area, characteristic culture that includes a whole range of tribal modes of life, i.e., language, customs, traditions, religious beliefs, arts and crafts, etc., archaic traits portraying occupational pattern, economy, etc., and lack of educational and economic development. The profile of schedule tribes since independence has been changing like other communities. The areas of populations, education, medical health, basic amenities like water, electricity, etc and the crimes against ST population have been analyzed over the past decade or so. However, the change observed in schedule tribes has been slower than other communities. Due to lack of awareness among these communities, the slower rate has been observed20,21. The schedule areas spread among the length and breadth of India and the current profile of schedule areas as per the Constitution of India has been presented. The central government and state governments have initiated schemes for betterment of scheduled tribes but still all programs are not reaching effectively to the tribes hence, government should take concert decisions to make them effective and some more programs are to be introduced for betterment of Scheduled Tribes in India22.
REFERENCES:
1. The Constitution of India.
2. Jayakumar A. and Palaniyammal P. Socio-economic status of scheduled tribes in Kalrayan hills. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, 4 (3); 2016: 22-30.
3. https://www.niti.gov.in/
4. Ministry of Socio Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India.
5. http://censusindia.gov.in
6. Office of the Registrar General, India
7. Bhttp://udise.in/contactus.htm
8. http://aishe.nic.in/aishe/home
9. http://www.who.int/
10. http://rchiips.org/nfhs/
11. http://www.mospi.gov.in/national-sample-survey-office-nsso
12. http://labourbureaunew.gov.in/UserContent/EUS_5th_1.pdf
13. http://ncrb.gov.in/
14. https://www.tribal.nic.in/ST/StatisticalProfileofSTs2013.pdf
15. Indian Scheduled Tribes
16. Status of Women in Tribal Society of India – Essay [Online].
17. Journal of Rural Studies. 16 (1); 2009: 1-11.
18. Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Development of Tribal Women in Society, International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 6 (8); 2018: 621-626.
19. Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Effects of Technological Development through Electronic Communication in Women Empowerment, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHSS). 7 (5); 2018: 93-100.
20. Socio-economic empowerment of women through ‘Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013’ – the missing link?
21. Ministry of Socio Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India.
22. Panduranga R and Nayakara Honnurswamy, Status of Scheduled Tribes In India, ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. ISSN 2348-3164 (online) 2 (4)2014: 245-252.
23. Tharu Manisha and Yadav Ram Ganesh, Impact of Skill Development Programmes on Tribal Communities: A Case Study of Lakhimpur Kheri District of Uttar Pradesh, International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature. 6 (9); 2018:237-250.
Received on 29.10.2018 Modified on 29.11.2018
Accepted on 28.12.2018 ©AandV Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(2): 513-523.
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00085.8