An Analysis of Cancer causing Substances and its Impact on Prevalence of Cancer Cases among General Population residing along Thamirabharani River Basin – Evidence based research

 

Sujitha S, Sindhu R, Prabu D*, Rajmohan M, Dinesh Dhamodhar

Professor and Head, Dept. of Public Health Dentistry, Public Health Forum,

Ramapuram, Chennai - 89, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: researchphdsrm@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

As water quality degradation worsens in many countries, economic growth is stunted, health conditions worsen, food production is reduced, and poverty is exacerbated. The aim is to study the quantified levels of carcinogens in the environment, according to IARC Classification such as Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Nickel, Lead, Nitrite/Nitrate and Phosphates and its correlation with spurts of cancer cases across certain sites that lie along Thamirabharani river basin, Tamil Nadu, India. A Systematic literature review for cross-sectional studies that provided information about the groundwater quality was carried out using six databases, "Researchgate, PubMed, Elsevier science direct, Wiley Online Library, Medline and Springerlink" from 2005 to 2021. TNCRP 2021 was taken as a reference to analyze the percentage of all types of cancer cases reported in the districts that lie along the river basin. Quality assessment was done using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The results show the presence of high concentration of carcinogens in the groundwater and sediments collected near the industries, agricultural land and municipal sewage yard. The significant association between exceeding of the permissible limit of various heavy metal elements and compounds and percentage of cancer cases at that particular site is established in this study. Oral findings commonly associated with chronic toxicity of carcinogenic heavy metals are listed which serves as an alarming signal to adapt to healthy lifestyle and dietary modifications as required.

 

KEYWORDS: Heavy metals, Carcinogens, Industrialization, Environmental Pollution, Thamirabharani, Cancer.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

“Clean water is a key factor for economic growth. Deteriorating water quality is stalling economic growth, worsening health conditions, reducing food production, and exacerbating poverty in many countries.” said World Bank Group President David Malpass in the press release ‘Worsening Water Quality Reducing Economic Growth by a Third in Some Countries: World Bank.’

 

He further added, “Their governments must take urgent actions to help tackle water pollution so that countries can grow faster in equitable and environmentally sustainable ways.”1

 

As we are moving towards the Sustainable developmental Goal 6 in another 5 years progress report for the year 2020, 74% of the global population used safely managed drinking water services, 60% in rural and 86% in urban. The number of people without accessible safe drinking water remained at 2 billion, of which 1.2 billion had access to basic services, 282 million had limited services, 367 million had unimproved sources, and 122 million drank water from the ground surface2. This study reviews the levels of carcinogenic compounds in the groundwater from previous studies and aims to find the association between the levels and increase in cancer cases in the respective districts as per TNCRP report 20213.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Information sources:

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, the following electronic databases were searched from 2005 until 2020: PubMed, Wiley online library, Elsevier science direct, SpringerLink and ResearchGate. Among, 209 articles collected, 49 full text articles relevant to the district were independently assessed. After assessing for eligibility with inclusion and exclusion criteria, removing duplicates and others, a total of 9 articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The search strategy for the databases below is shown in Figure 1.

 

Figure 1: Flow diagram showing the number of studies identified screened assessed for eligibility excluded and included in systematic review.

 

 

Search strategy: The search strategies included Boolean operators for the following combinations of keywords: ‘Thamirabharani’ or ‘Cancer’ or ‘Environmental toxicity’ or ‘carcinogens’ or ‘heavy metal intoxication’ or ‘toxic pollutants’ or ‘heavy metal status’ or ‘Industrial contaminants’ or ‘Occupational exposure’ or ‘water pollution’ or ‘soil pollution’ or ‘industrial effluents.’

 

Study location: Thamirabharani is a perennial river in Tamil Nadu state, India that flows through the districts of Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi. Agriculture, hand-woven clothes and household industries contribute to the economic growth of the city. Thoothukudi is known by the name 'Pearl city'. The major industries are salt pans, shipping, fishing, agricultural, power and chemical industries.

 

Inclusion criteria:

We included studies conducted in Thamirabharani river, Tirunelveli, Thoothukudi and Kanyalumari districts. Only those articles that are available electronically were considered. Original studies that were published in English with available full-text were included. Studies that used standardized methods of measurements and validation tools were included in the study. Studies that have been carried out with appropriate statistical analysis had included in the study.

 

Exclusion criteria:

Exposure to toxic substances occurred due to accidental spillage were excluded from the study. Studies undertaken by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board were excluded.

 

Data extraction and synthesis:

For studies that met the eligibility criteria, the following data was collected: Citation (author/year), study area, study duration, number and type of samples (air/water/soil) collected, carcinogens found in the samples, method of testing samples and test result values. The values were compared with standardized normal limits set by WHO/BIS/CEQG for drinking water source, air and soil. Quality assessment was carried out using Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

 

Methodology:

Based on the study conducted in Noyyal river basin4. We used IARC lists of classification of carcinogens, Volumes 1-133, to enumerate the group of carcinogens along with the cancer site5. Carcinogens exceeding the standard limit were checked for its carcinogenic potential and cancer sites showing sufficient and limited evidences in humans by IARC lists of classification of carcinogens and by cancer site respectively6. The percentages of all types of cancer cases reported in Tirunelveli, Thoothukudi and Kanyakumari was calculated using Tamil Nadu Cancer Registry Project report 2021 data, published by the Cancer Institute, Adyar and the state health department3. The percentages obtained were then used to find the association between the excessive presence of carcinogens and their contribution to the increased prevalence of cancer. Tamil Nadu average count for each district were calculated by adding number of cancer cases of specific type in all the districts divided by 38 (total 38 districts in Tamil Nadu state).

 


RESULT:

Table 1:   Review of articles on the presence of carcinogenic agents in the Thambirabharani river basin, its method of assessment and the results obtained.

Author

Year

Place of

Study

Study Duration

Sample Size Sample Site

Methods of

Measurements

Carcinogen

Results

Normal Permissible Limit (PL)

L Prabudoss Kumar et al;

2019

Tamirabharani7

Jan – Mar 2017

water and sediment samples  11 different locations at Tamirabharani

Standard analytic method

Lead

Water- 0.01-0.03g/l

Sediment-

0.26 to 0.74µg/g

WHO-0.01mg/l

Divya Sapphire M et al; 2016

Tamirabharani8

pre-monsoon post-monsoon summer

Water samples at Thalaianai Cheranmadevi

Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS)

Lead  (mg/l)

Cadmium 

Chromium

Thalaianai – BDL

Cheranmadevi:

Lead-0.23

Cadmium-1.70

Chromium- 1.00

WHO (2013)

0.01

0.05

0.003

Mathivanan V

et al 2013

Tamirabharani9

Jan 2013 – June 2013

Water samples at Naranammal Puram (Station 1) and Sutthamalli (Station II)

BIS IS-10500: 2012 method

Nitrate(mg/l)

 

Nitrite 

 

Phosphate

Station I: 4 – 9.29

Station II: 5 – 10.5

Station I: 4 – 9.29

Station II: 5 – 10.5

Station I: 0.18 – 2.81

Station II: 0.6 – 4.89

45mg/l

 

0.1mg/l

-

S.S. Nawab Ali et al 2021

Tirunelveli10

 

 

40 water samples at Karayar

Papanasam

Settimedu

Harikesavanallur

Pathamadai

Atomic Absorption Spectrometer Perkin Elmer AA200

Chromium

 

 

 

 

Cadmium

 

 

 

 

 

 Lead

Karayar-0.04-0.06

Papanasam-0.04-0.08

Settimedu-0.02-0.04

Harikesavanallur-0.02

Pathamadai-0.02-0.06

Karayar-0.01-0.06

Papanasam-0.01-0.04

Settimedu-0.02-0.04

Harikesavanallur-0.02-0.05

Pathamadai-0.02-0.03

Karayar-0.04-0.05

Papanasam-0.02-0.04

Settimedu-0.02-0.05

Harikesavanallur-0.02-0.08

Pathamadai-0.01-0.03

WHO

0.003

 

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

S. Sivakumar Karthikeyan et al; 2021

Tuticorin11

pre and post-monsoon seasons in the year 2017

groundwater samples  at 40 locations in Tuticorin industrial block

Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer – Perkin Elmer AA 200

Chromium

 

 

 

Nickel

 

 

 

Cobalt

 

 

 

Lead

 

Pre-monsoon: 0.001 to 0.184mg/l

Post-monsoon: 0.038 to 0.845mg/l

Pre-monsoon:

0.015 to 0.757mg/l

Post-monsoon 0.014 to 0.266mg/l

Pre-monsoon:

0.104 to 2.429mg/l

Post-monsoon: 0.005 to 0.193mg/l

Pre-monsoon:

0.171 to 2.221mg/l

Post-monsoon: 0.004 to 0.810mg/l

WHO (2012)

0.05

 

0.02

 

 

 

0.05mg/l

 

 

 

0.01

A.Kayalvizhi et al; 2019

Tuticorin12

 

7 groundwater samples  from Meelavitan, SIPCOT,

Sterlite, Muthiapuram, Periyanayaga Puram, Siluvaipatti, Mapilaiurani Shanmugapuram

ArcGIS 9.2 software

Arsenic

(mg/l)

 Lead  

Chromium 

Cadmium

Nickel

Chromium:

0.0015-0.08

Nickel:

0.000082-0.011

Arsenic:

0.00087-0.0837

Cadmium:

0.000012-0.0021

Lead:

0.00045-0.018

WHO (2012)

0.05

0.02

 

0.01

 

0.003

 

0.01

C. Puthiyasekar et al; 2010

Thoothukudi and Tirunelveli13

 

 

July 2006 to June 2007

July 2007 to May 2008

Bore water SIPCOT 1 and 2

Kamarajar College

Paniammai Velankanni Church

Karaisuthu Uvari

Athankarai Palli

Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (VARIAN 240 FS)

Cadmium

(mg/kg) 

Lead

July 2006 to June 2007

Lead: BDL to 0.16

Cadmium: BDL to 0.06

 

July 2007 to May 2008

Lead: 0.01 to 0.21

Cadmium: 0.01-0.23

 

WHO

 

0.01mg/kg

 

0.003mg/kg

Sajimol Sundar et al; 2021

Kanyakumari 14

late summer of 2018

64 samples along the sediments of Kanyakumari beach

Niton FXL, 950 energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF).

Cadmium

Lead

 Nickel

Cobalt Chromium

4±1mg/kg

31±43mg/kg

267±154mg/kg

42±30 mg/kg

167±302mg/kg

 

J. Malathi et al; 2005

Kanyakumari15

 

55 sand samples  at Agastheeswaram taluk

NaI(TI) gamma ray spectrometer

232Th activity

32.18-32147.22Bq/kg

4786.78 µSv/year

 

Table 1 shows the review of articles on method of measurement of particular carcinogen and the results obtained at particular site as given by Prabudoss Kumar L et al, Divya Sapphire M et al, Nawab Ali SS et al, Sivakumar Karthikeyan S et al, Kayalvizhi A et al, Puthiyasekar C et al, Sajimol Sundar et al and Malathi J et al

 

Table 2: Quality Assessment: Newcastle Ottawa scale

Aauthor and Year

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Representativeness of the samples

Sample size

Non- respondent

Ascertainment of the exposure

Assessment of the outcome

Statistical test

Prabudoss L Kumar et al7

*

*

-

*

*

**

-

Divya Sapphire et al8

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

Mathivanan V et al9

*

*

-

*

*

**

-

Nawab Ali SS et al10

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

Sivakumar KS et al11

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

.Kayalvizhi A et al12

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

Puthiyasekar C et al13

*

*

-

*

*

**

-

Sajimol et al14

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

Malathi J et al15

*

*

-

*

*

**

*

 

Table 3: Percentage of cancer cases and its association with carcinogen levels in the Thamirabharani river.

DDistrict

Carcinogens5

Mean range obtained*

Normal value

[WHO, 2013]

Cancer site6

Percentage of cancer cases3

Tirunelveli

 

Cadmium

0.02-0.08

0.003

Lung, Prostate and Kidney

Stomach – 5%

Lung – 4.6%

Prostate – 2.1%

Nasal cavity– 4.3%

Kidney - 3.9%

Chromium

0.01-0.06

0.05

Nasal cavity and paranasal cavity and Lung

Lead

0.01-0.08

0.01

Stomach

Nitrite

4-10.5

0.1

Stomach

Nitrate

4-10.5

45

Stomach

Phosphate

0.18 – 4.89

-

Stomach

Thoothukudi

Cadmium

0.000012-0.0021

0.003

Lung, Prostate and Kidney

Nasal cavity– 1.6%

Prostate – 1.25%

Kidney – 2.5%

Lung – 2.8%

Stomach – 2.7%

Bladder – 1.6%

Skin – 2%

Liver – 2%

Chromium

0.001-0.845

0.05

Nasal cavity and paranasal cavity and Lung

Lead

0.00045-2.221

0.01

Stomach

Cobalt

0.005-2.429

0.05

Lung

Nickel

0.000082-0.757

0.02

Nasal cavity and paranasal cavity and Lung

Arsenic

0.00087- 0.0837

0.01

Bladder, Lung, Skin, Prostate, Kidney and Liver

Kanyakumari

Cadmium

4±1mg/kg

-

Lung, Prostate and Kidney

Stomach – 2%

Lung – 3.8%

Prostate – 3.5%

Nasal cavity– 3.3%

Kidney -  1.7%

Liver – 4%

 Gall bladder – 3.1%

Pancreas – 5%

Leukemia – 2.4%

Chromium

167±302mg/kg

-

Nasal cavity and paranasal cavity and Lung

Lead

31±43mg/kg

-

Stomach

Cobalt

42±30 mg/kg

-

Lung

Nickel

267±154mg/kg

-

Nasal cavity and paranasal cavity and Lung

232Th activity

32.18-32147.22Bq/kg

4786.78 µSv/year

Liver, Bile duct, Gall bladder, Pancreas, Prostate and Leukemia

Source:

*Mean value of carcinogens was the cumulated score of different studies described in the Table 1; Units – mg/l.

Mean score was compared with WHO 2013 standard limits for drinking water; Units – mg/l.

 


Interpretation:

 

Figure 2: Graphical representation of heavy metal concentration in water samples in Tirunelveli district compared with normal limit of WHO standards


.

Figure 3: Graphical representation of heavy metal concentration in water samples in Thoothukudi district compared with normal limit of WHO standards.

 

Figure 4: Graphical representation of heavy metal concentration in sediment samples in Kanyakumari district compared with normal limit of WHO standards.

 

Figure 5:  No. of cancer cases recorded in Tirunelveli district compared with Tamil Nadu Average count.

 

Figure 6:  No. of cancer cases recorded in Thoothukudi district compared with Tamil Nadu Average count.


 

Figure 7:  No. of cancer cases recorded in Kanyakumari district compared with Tamil Nadu Average count.

 

Table 5: List of micronutrient interfering in the metabolism of carcinogenic heavy metal in the body (Toxicology profiles, ASTDR)16

Carcinogens

Micronutrients17-21

Recommended Diet

Cadmium

Iron and zinc

Greens, Nuts and Seeds, Liver,

Fish, Meat and dairy products

Chromium VI

Calcium and magnesium

Broccoli, Cabbage, Lady’s finger, Bananas, Oranges and dairy products

Nickel

Iron and magnesium

Greens, Beans, Peas, Bananas, Nuts and Seeds, Liver and dairy products

Lead

Iron, calcium, zinc and vitamin C

Nuts and Seeds, Oranges, Grapes,

Watermelon, Indian Gooseberry22, Greens, Tomato, Potato, Broccoli, Cabbage, Lady’s finger, Fish, Meat, Liver and dairy products

Arsenic

Vitamin A, B9, E and selenium

Papaya, Watermelon, Wheat germ, Nuts and Seeds, Carrots, Greens, Sweet potato, Broccoli, Pumpkin, Cauliflower, Spinach, Chick peas, Peas, Brown rice, Eggs, Chicken, liver, Fish and dairy products

Cobalt

Iron and Glutathione

Greens, Nuts and Seeds, Avocado, Broccoli, Okra, Almonds, Liver,

Fish, Meat and dairy products

Nitrite/nitrates/phosphates

Include all vitamins and mineral rich foods

Greens, Mushrooms, Peanuts, Soya bean, Cereals, Legumes including all the above mentioned items.

 


 

 

DISCUSSION:

Due to rapid urbanization, the nation’s economy grows tremendously building up various large scale industries, small scale industries, and foundries, developing infrastructures that are essential for transport, education and health care sectors. The other aspect of urbanization comes along with deleterious effect on environment affecting air, water and soil quality, getting into the food chain ultimately increasing health risk of population. Groundwater is a vital source of water meeting up with basic domestic needs, agricultural requirements and renders industrial development in the sustainability and functioning of ecosystems.

 

‘Tirunelveli Corporation councilors urged district Mayor to take immediate action in order to save Thamirabharani river from getting polluted by the outflow of sewage while being pumped from the underground drainage system to the Ramaiyanpatti garbage yard due to the breaches in the pipeline at various places.’ reported recently in the ‘The Hindu’ newspaper. By facing direct discharges of domestic waste, sewage, and solid waste along its banks, the Thamirabarani River and its tributaries have become heavily polluted23. Deterioration of water quality and ingestion heavy metals and other carcinogenic compounds into the groundwater system leads to various communicable and non-communicable disease including cancers. This might be one of the leading causes of sudden increase in the spurts of cancer cases in the state.

 

According to6-9 study showed that Cheranmahadevi and papanasam is highly polluted with lead, chromium, cadmium, nitrite and phosphate beyond WHO standard limit. Agriculture, beedi industries and metal industries serve as a major source of income for people residing in Cheranmahadevi. Estimation of groundwater samples for heavy metal contaminatio in Tuticorin and found arsenic exceeding the WHO standard limit in 35 samples and lead in 9 samples. The studies reported high concentration of chromium was due to heavy vehicle workshops, nickel due to sewage waters, lead was mainly due to petroleum products used in fisheries boat and cobalt due to electroplating, smelting and fertilizer industrial effluent11,12. Sajimol Sundar et al 2012 study in Kanyakumari show that the concentration of cadmium in sediment sample collected exceeds the detection limit in 42 sites; lead exceeds the detection limit 47 sites; nickel in 7 sites exceeds the detection limit; cobalt in 37 sites; chromium in 46 sites and arsenic exceeds at 12 sites. The study stated that the problem of metal contamination is increasing along the coastal regions due to increasing population and over extraction of groundwater for domestic, agricultural and industrial activities14.

 

As mentioned in Table 4, Literatures suggest that deficiencies of micronutrients leads to increased uptake of these heavy metals and meeting up with the needs gradual decreased the levels of toxic substances. High risk population such as those who are close by to industries, sewage yard, agricultural lands, with evident oral lesions (as mentioned in table 4), young children, pregnant women, very old age people, those who consume alcohol and tobacco products are more susceptible to mutagenesis. They are advised to consult physician and check for serum concentration levels for carcinogens and complete vitamin profile. Thus dietary modifications are recommended for individuals as preventive or therapeutic measures in reversing the abnormal levels of carcinogens in the body (Toxicology profiles, ASTDR)16.

 

In an attempt to reduce the environmental pollution precautionary measures for industrial sectors which produce Cadmium, chromium VI, cobalt, nickel and lead as by products are recommended to follow zero waste strategy, Reverse Osmosis and use of magnetic nano particles filtration; Agricultural sector where arsenic, nitrite/nitrate, phosphates, cadmium and chromium VI used are recommended to follow phytoremediation methods such as to use plant species like Saccharomyces sp., Parthenium hysterophorus L Asteraceae, Sonneratia caseolaris24-27 to absorb heavy metals and reduce the toxicity. Food Safety Department should ensure that foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts and species are not contaminated with either fertilizers or pesticides. Entomology/Toxicology Department of Agriculture should monitor the overuse of fertilizers and pesticides by farmers; it is necessary to provide farmers with information about eco-friendly fertilizers28. Municipal/Corporation/Domestic waste can be managed by installing Mini sewage treatment plants, Material recycling, and thermal treatment like incineration, biogas generation, composting and more importantly environmental education29-32.

 

As sample sites are limited to a few zones and areas, the study may not generalize to the entire district but in contrast only district-level cancer prevalence data are available, with no information on zone-level or taluk-level cancer prevalence. With the available and limited source of data, we could find a positive association between carcinogen levels and cancer prevalence.

 

CONCLUSION:

The present systematic review shows that excessive presence of carcinogens can have a carcinogenic impact on the general population. It's high time we raise our voices for ourselves and bring it to the attention of the Tamil Nadu Government and authorities concerned so that they can respond on an emergency basis and save millions of lives.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Press release: Worsening Water Quality Reducing Economic Growth by a Third in Some Countries: World Bank. The World Bank: IBRD-IDA. (Accessed on: August 20, 2023). https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2019/08/20/worsening-water-quality-reducing-economic-growth-by-a-third-in-some-countries

2.      Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene; 2000-2020. WHO | UNICEF JMP. https://data.unicef.org/resources/progress-on-household-drinking-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-2000-2020/ (Accessed on August 23, 2023).

3.      Sampath P., Swaminathan R on behalf of the TNCRP Study Group. 2021. Cancer incidence and mortality (Year 2017), incidence trend (2012-2017) and estimates (2018-2021) for Tamil Nadu state. Tamil Nadu Cancer Registry Project, Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

4.      Sujitha S, Prabu D, Dinesh Dhamodhar, Rajmohan M, Sindhu R. An analysis of cancer causing agents and its association with the prevalence of cancer cases in Noyyal river basin, Tamil Nadu, India - A Explorative study based on scientific evidences. Int J Health Sci Res. 2023; 13(9):1-13.

5.      World Health Organisation. 2022 IARC list of carcinogens. IARC Monographs Volumes 1-132. https://monographs.iarc.who.int/list-of-classifications/

6.      World Health Organisation. 2022. List of classifiacations by cancer sites with sufficient or limited evidence in humans, IARC Monographs Volumes 1-132 https://monographs.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Classifications_by_cancer_site.pdf

7.      Prabudoss Kumar L, Ramkumar J, Jesu A, Dheenadayalan MS. A correlation study of heavy metal in Thamirabarani river region at Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews. 2019; 6(1):15-19.

8.      Mathivanan V, Sangeetha V, Uma Maheswari D, Selvisabhanayakam. Environmental pollution monitoring studies on Thambiraparani river at Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Current Research. 2013; 5(10):3001-3007.

9.      Divya Sapphire M, Sabaridasan., Jesslin G., Edwin Thangam P., Soranam R. Analysis of water quality parameters and heavy metals concentration from the selected sites of Tamiraparani river, Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu, India. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences. 2016; 5(7): 47-54.

10.   Nawab Ali SS, Mohamed Sihabudeen M, Syed Abuthahir SS. Study of heavy metal pollution in groundwater near proximity of Thamirabharani river, Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences. 2021; 10(11): 296-304.

11.   Sivakumar Karthikeyan, Shanmugasundaram Arumugam, Jayaprakash Muthumanickam, Prabakaran Kulandaisamy, Muthusamy Subramanian, Ramachandran Annadurai et al. Causes of heavy metal contamination in groundwater of Tuticorin Industrial block, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28: 18651-18666.

12.   Kayalvizhi A, Evany Nithya S. Assessment of heavymetal in and around the industrial zone of Tuticorin. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 2019; 7(2): 1-5.

13.   Puthiyasekar C, Neelakantan MA, Poongothai S. Heavy metal contamination in bore water due to industrial pollution and polluted and non-polluted sea water intrusion in Thoothukudi and Tirunelveli of South Tamil Nadu, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination Toxicology. 2010; 85:598-601.

14.   Sajimol Sundar, Priyadarsi D. Roy, Lakshumanan Chokkalingam, Nagarajan Ramasamy. Evaluation of metals and trace elements in sediments of Kanyakumari beach (southernmost India) and their possible impact on coastal aquifiers. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2021; 169: 112527.

15.   Malathi J, Brahmanandhan GM, Khanna D, Selvasekarapandian S. Study of primordial radionuclide distribution in sand samples of Agastheeswaran taluk of Kanyakumari district, India. International Congress Series-Elsevier. 2005; 1276:321-322.

16.   Toxicology profiles. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Last Reviewed: May 3, 2023

17.   Raschida R Bouhouch, Sana El-Fadeli, Maria Andersson, Abdelmounaim Aboussad, Laila Chabaa and Christophe Zeder et al. Effects of wheat-flour biscuits fortified with iron and EDTA, alone and in combination, on blood lead concentration, iron status, and cognition in children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. American Journal Clinical Nutrition. 2016; 104:1318–26.

18.   Geir Bjørklund, Shiblur Rahaman, Mariia Shanaida Roman Lysiuk, Petro Oliynyk and Larysa Lenchyk et al. Natural Dietary Compounds in the treatment of Arsenic Toxicity. Molecules. 2022; 27(15): 4871.

19.   Regina M. Krohn, Rubhana Raqib, Evana Akthar, Albert Vandenberg and Judit E.G. Smits. A high selenium lentil dietary intervention in Bangladesh to counteract arsenic toxicity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BioMed Central. Trials. 2016; 17(21)

20.   Pankaj B. Bhogam, Sushant A. Gharal, Tushar B. Patil, Aarti A. Varne, Priyanka S. Lad. A Systematic Review on Anticancer Phytosomal Flavonoids. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2023; 13(4): 343-6. doi: 10.52711/2231-5659.2023.00059

21.   Kanchan R. Pagar, Sarika V. Khandbahale, D. G. Phadtare. The Therapeutic Potential of Resveratrol: A Review of Clinical Trials. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2019; 9(3): 193-199. doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2019.00031.5

22.   Surya Rajeev Nair, Shreelakshmi, Bharathwaj, Sindhu.R, Rajmohan and Prabu.D et al. Systematic review on the use of Indian Gooseberry in improvement of oral hygiene. Drug and Cell Therapies in Hematology. 2021; 10(1): 2611–2620.

23.   Tirunelveli councilors demand measures to halt sewage inflow into Thamirabarani river. The Hindu – Madurai. Dated on: May 29, 2023. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/tirunelveli-councilors-demand-measures-to-halt-sewage-inflow-into-thamirabarani-river/article66907658.ece

24.   Preeti Sinha. Phytoremediation Techniques. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(11): 5359-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00903

25.   Damini D, Sukriti P, C.Subathra Devi, E. Selvarajan, V. Suganthi, V. Mohanasrinivasan. Removal of Heavy Metals from Leather Industry Effluent Using Saccharomyces sp In a Packed Bed Reactor. Research J. Engineering and Tech. 2013; 4(2): 53-56

26.   Alok Awasthi. Bio- accumulation of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb in a wild grass, Parthenium hysterophorus L. Asteraceae, growing naturally on barren land and evaluation of phyto-extraction potential of the plant for studied metals. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2023; 16(4): 277-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00046

27.   G.V. Krishna Mohan, S. R. Wate. The Assessment of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Phytoremediation Species of Sonneratia caseolaris, Tropical Dry Evergreen Forests of Peninsular India. Asian J. Research Chem. 2011; 4(5): 741-745

28.   Elakiya Sugumaran, Prashanthy MR, Bharathwaj VV, Prabu D, SunayanaManipal and Rajmohan. Glyphosate, Phorate, and Monocrotophos Hazardous Pesticide Usage and Its Public Health Impact – An Empirical Analysis. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2021; 15(5): 156–161.

29.   Alekh Kumar Sahu, Dolamani Sahu. Role of Education in Controlling of Environmental Pollution. Int. J. Rev. and Res. Social Sci. 2013; 1(1): 27-28

30.   Kelvin Kibet, Esther W. Nthiga, Moses A. Ollengo. Removal of Cd2+ and Cr3+ ions from Aqueous Solution by Modified Polypropylene Plastic Waste: Equilibrium Study. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2023; 16(5): 349-7. doi: 10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00056

31.   Hassan T Abdulsahib, Abdulamir H Taobi, Salah S Hashem. A Novel Adsorbent Based on Lignin and Tannin for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2015; 7(1): 38-48. doi: 10.5958/0975-4385.2015.00009.6

32.   Kaushal Patidar, Ankita Chaudhari. A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programe on Knowledge regarding prevention of Lung Cancer among Industrial Workers in selected Industry of Mehsana District.Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2019; 9(3):346-348. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2019.00074.0

 

 

 

 

Received on 17.11.2023         Modified on 08.01.2024

Accepted on 09.02.2024      ©AandV Publications All right reserved

Res.  J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(1)24-30.

DOI: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00005