This Research Paper focuses on and deals with the various aspects of Surveillance in India and Internationally. The paper mainly focuses on the State of Surveillance in India and the laws revolving around it as well as the evolution of the Fundamental Right to Privacy in India. The concept of surveillance is divided into two sections of State Surveillance and Corporate Surveillance. It discusses the duty and the Liability of each concerning the Right to Privacy. The Paper also compares India’s Privacy and Surveillance policy with The United States of America and The United Arab Emirates. The United States of America dramatically changed its Surveillance Policy after the terrorist attack of 9/11. The United Arab Emirates envisages a more liberal and comprehensive approach towards Surveillance in their State. It gives the detailed comparison between the laws of these three nations and the vices and virtues of these laws of each nation. The advantages and the disadvantages of surveillance are analysed on various aspects and with an international perspective. This paper attempt to give a comprehensive idea of Surveillance and its impact on the people as well as in the international level due to the fast-pacing globalization.
Cite this article:
Priya Rao. State Surveillance and Corporate Surveillance. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;13(3):193-0. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2022.00031
Priya Rao. State Surveillance and Corporate Surveillance. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;13(3):193-0. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2022.00031 Available on: https://www.rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-13-3-11
1. 1954 AIR 300
2. 1963 AIR 1295
3. AIR 1975 SC 1378
4. 1995 AIR 264
5. AIR 1997 SC 568
6. (2017) 10 SCC 1
7. Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India, https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Personal_Data_Protection_Bill,2018.pdf
8. Anirudh Burman, “The Growth of Prrivacy Regulation and the Bill”, Carnegie Endowmwnt for International Peace, 3-6, March 1st, 2020
9. Section 5 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 – Power for the government to take possession of licencesd telegraphs and to order interception of messages.
10. Sangeeta Mahapatra, “Digital Surveillance and the Threat to Civil Liberties in India”, German Institute of Global and Area Studies, 12 pages, May 1st, 2021
11. AIR 1997 SC 568
12. Gautam Bhatia, “State Surveillance and The Right to Privacy In India”, Vol: 26, National Law School of India Review, 127-158, 2014.
13. G.S.R. 193 (E), 1st March 2007, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, https://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/march2007.pdf?download=1
14. Writ Petition no. 2637 of 2019, Bombay High Court
15. Sec. 69 of The Information Technology Act,2000 - Power to issue directions for interception or monitoring or decryption of any information through any computer resource
16. G.S.R. 780 (E), 27th October 2009, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.
17. Nolen Gertz, “The Four Facebooks” Vol: 58, The New Atlantis, 65-70, Spring 2019
18. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/project-pegasus-phones-of-2-ministers-3-opp-leaders-among-many-targeted-for- surveillance-report-7411027/
19. Farrell, Paul (2 December 2013). "History of 5-Eyes – explainer". Theguardian.com. Retrieved 30 October 2021
20. "Unmasking the Five Eyes' global surveillance practices - GI Swatch". giswatch.org. Retrieved 30 October 2021
21. Poitras, Laura; Greenwald, Glenn (2013-06-09). "NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden: 'I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things' – video". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 October 2021
22. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities ("Church Committee"). Book II, Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans (PDF) (Final Report, S. Rep. No. 94-755 (1976) ed.). United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2021
24. Campbell, Duncan (12 August 1988). "Somebody's Listening". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 2007-01-03. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
25. Schmid, Gerhard (11 July 2001). "On the existence of a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications (ECHELON interception system), (2001/2098(INI))" (pdf). European Parliament: Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System. p. 194. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
26. Mass surveillance in the United States - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_the_United_States
27. Declan McCullagh (14 April 2006). "ISP snooping gaining support". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
29. David Dominguez, Odette Pantoja, Pablo Pico, Miguel Mateos, María del Mar Alonso-Almeida, Mario González Panama Papers' offshoring network behaviour, Heliyon, Volume 6, Issue 6, 2020, e04293, ISSN 2405-8440,
30. Original report of International Consortium Of Investigative Journalist Retrieved on 2nd November 2021
31. Clifton L. Smith, David J. Brooks, in Security Science, 2013
32. Clifton L. Smith, David J. Brooks, in Security Science, 2013
33. 568 U.S. 398 (more) 133 S. Ct. 1138; 185 L. Ed. 2d 264; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 1858; 2013 ILRC 1311; 41 Med. L. Rptr. 1357; 81 U.S.L.W. 4121