ABSTRACT:
Poverty is a complex and multifaceted issue that continues to afflict societies worldwide, transcending geographical boundaries and affecting individuals from diverse backgrounds. This abstract seeks to provide a brief overview of the various dimensions of poverty, examining its causes, impacts, and potential solutions. Poverty is a complex and persistent challenge that demands urgent attention from policymakers, Civil society organizations and individuals alike. By understanding the multifaceted nature of poverty and working together to implement sustainable solutions, We can move closer to a world where everyone has the opportunity to thrive and fulfill their potential.
Cite this article:
Nawaz Ahmed Naik. Poverty and related issues in India. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(3):245-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00036
Cite(Electronic):
Nawaz Ahmed Naik. Poverty and related issues in India. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;15(3):245-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00036 Available on: https://www.rjhssonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-15-3-11
REFERENCES:
1. S.M. Dev. 2002. Poverty in India: Trends, Macro-Policies and Direct Programmes. In M.G. Rao, ed. Development, Poverty and Fiscal Policy: Decentralization of Institutions. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
2. Dev, 2002. 3. D.A. Aschauer. 1989a. Is Public Expenditure Productive. Journal of Monetary Economics. 23. pp. 177–200. 1989b. Public Investment and Productivity Growth in the Group of Seven. Economic Perspectives. 13. pp. 17–25. 1989c. Does Public Capital Crowd Out Private Capital? Journal of Monetary Economics. 24. pp. 171–88.
3. R. Kanbur. 2004. Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Some Hard Questions, Commentary prepared for the State of the World Conference, Princeton Institute for International Infrastructure Development and Poverty Reduction E 259 and Regional Studies, Princeton University, February 13–14. Downloaded from www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sk145.
4. R. Gunatilaka. 2002. Fiscal Decentralisation, Rural Development and Poverty Reduction: A Sri Lankan Perspective. In M.G. Rao, ed. Development, Poverty and Fiscal Policy: Decentralization of Institutions. Oxford University Press: New Delhi.
5. R. Masika and S. Baden. 1997. Infrastructure and Poverty: A Gender Analysis. A Report for Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Report Number 51.
6. D. Canning and P. Pedroni. 1999. Infrastructure and Long Run Economic Growth. July.
7. ADB. H. Jalilian and J. Weiss. 2004. Infrastructure, Growth and Poverty: Some Country Evidence. Paper Prepared for ADB Institute Annual Conference.
8. ADB. Xianbin Yao. 2003. Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: Making Markets Work for the Poor. ERD Policy Brief No. 14, Economics and Research Department. S. Fan, P. Hazell and S. Thorat. 1999. Government Spending, Growth and Poverty: An Analysis of Interlinkages in Rural India. Environment and Production Technology Division. Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. S. Fan, L.X. Zhang, and X.B. Zhang. 2002. Growth, Inequality, and Poverty in Rural China: The Role of Public Investments. Research Report 125. Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute
9. J. Jalan and M. Ravallion. 2002. Geographic Poverty Traps? A Micro Model of Consumption Growth in Rural China. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 17 (4). M. Ravallion and G. Datt. 2001. Why Has Economic Growth Been More Pro-Poor in Some States of India than Others? Available at http://econ.worldbank.org/ programs/ poverty/topic/2543/library/doc?id=2715.
10. Sawada 2000. 15. ADB. I. Ali and E. Pernia. 2003. Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: What is the Connection? ERD Policy Brief No. 13. Economics and Research Department. Asian Development Bank. They cite...prove their point.